Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25207917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Electron tomography of cryo-immobilized plant tissue: a novel approach to studying 3D macromolecular architecture of mature plant cell walls in situ.

Purbasha Sarkar, Elena Bosneaga, Edgar G Yap, Jyotirmoy Das, Wen-Ting Tsai, Angelo Cabal, Erica Neuhaus, Dolonchampa Maji, Shailabh Kumar, Michael Joo and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structure ofBiomacromolecules · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Purbasha SarkarEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Elena BosneagaEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Edgar G YapLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jyotirmoy DasEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Wen-Ting TsaiLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Angelo CabalEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Erica NeuhausLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Dolonchampa MajiEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Shailabh KumarEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Michael JooLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Sergey YakovlevMaterials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Roseann CsencsitsLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Zeyun YuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Chandrajit BajajDepartment of Computer Sciences & The Institute of Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Kenneth H DowningLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Manfred AuerEnergy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USEnergy Biosciences Institute · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

TUBULIN STRUCTURE BY ELECTRON CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP01GM051487 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CATE, JAMIE H · 1994 to 2018
$27.6M
Software Maintenance for Biomolecular ComplexesR01EB004873 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BAJAJ, CHANDRAJIT L · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004873NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB004873NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM051487NIGMS NIH HHS P01-GM051487-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cost-effective production of lignocellulosic biofuel requires efficient breakdown of cell walls present in plant biomass to retrieve the wall polysaccharides for fermentation. In-depth knowledge of plant cell wall composition is therefore essential for improving the fuel production process. The precise spatial three-dimensional (3D) organization of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin and lignin within plant cell walls remains unclear to date since the microscopy techniques used so far have been limited to two-dimensional, topographic or low-resolution imaging, or required isolation or chemical extraction of the cell walls. In this paper we demonstrate that by cryo-immobilizing fresh tissue, then either cryo-sectioning or freeze-substituting and resin embedding, followed by cryo- or room temperature (RT) electron tomography, respectively, we can visualize previously unseen details of plant cell wall architecture in 3D, at macromolecular resolution (∼ 2 nm), and in near-native state. Qualitative and quantitative analyses showed that wall organization of cryo-immobilized samples were preserved remarkably better than conventionally prepared samples that suffer substantial extraction. Lignin-less primary cell walls were well preserved in both self-pressurized rapidly frozen (SPRF), cryo-sectioned samples as well as high-pressure frozen, freeze-substituted and resin embedded (HPF-FS-resin) samples. Lignin-rich secondary cell walls appeared featureless in HPF-FS-resin sections presumably due to poor stain penetration, but their macromolecular features could be visualized in unprecedented details in our cryo-sections. While cryo-tomography of vitreous tissue sections is currently proving to be instrumental in developing 3D models of lignin-rich secondary cell walls, here we confirm that the technically easier method of RT-tomography of HPF-FS-resin sections could be used immediately for routine study of low-lignin cell walls. As a proof of principle, we characterized the primary cell walls of a mutant (cob-6) and wild type Arabidopsis hypocotyl parenchyma cells by RT-tomography of HPF-FS-resin sections, and detected a small but significant difference in spatial organization of cellulose microfibrils in the mutant walls.

Indexed as

CryopreservationArabidopsisCells, ImmobilizedCelluloseCell WallCryoultramicrotomyElectron Microscope TomographyFreeze SubstitutionImaging, Three-DimensionalMutationTemperatureTissue EmbeddingCellulose

Identifiers

PMID25207917
PMCPMC4160213
OpenAlexW1995383167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.