Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25207609›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of gastroenterology supplements (Print)2014

The narcotic bowel syndrome: a recent update.

Douglas Drossman, Eva Szigethy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of gastroenterology supplements (Print), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Surgical management of chronic pancreatitis: A narrative review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Diabetic Gastroparesis.Endocrine reviews · 2019
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Opioid misuse in gastroenterology and non-opioid management of abdominal pain.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Opioids in Gastroenterology: Treating Adverse Effects and Creating Therapeutic Benefits.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas DrossmanDepartment of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of North Carolina Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, and Drossman Gastroenterology PLLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Eva Szigethy1] Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA [2] Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe paradoxical development of chronic abdominal pain is an underrecognized side effect of opioid use. Narcotic bowel syndrome (NBS), occurring in a small proportion of chronic opioid users, consists of chronic or intermittent abdominal pain, which often increases in severity despite continued or escalating dosages of opioids prescribed to relieve pain.

methodsA PubMed search was conducted using terms such as "narcotic bowel syndrome" and "opioid hyperalgesia" through January 2014.

resultsAbdominal pain is the defining symptom of NBS and is thought to be mediated by central nervous system dysfunction; it should be distinguished from the peripheral side effects of opioids, such as nausea, bloating, intermittent vomiting, abdominal distension, and constipation. This latter cluster of symptoms is called opioid bowel dysfunction, although it may co-occur with NBS. Hypothesized mechanisms of the central effects of opioids on nociception in NBS include spinal cord inflammation and dysfunction in opioid receptor activity and related neuroanatomical substrates. With continued use, ∼6% of patients taking narcotics chronically will develop NBS, with profound consequences in terms of daily function. The primary management paradigm for NBS is a structured opioid withdrawal program accompanied by centrally acting adjunctive therapy comprising antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and clonidine to target pain, anxiety, and depression, and prevent withdrawal effects, in addition to peripherally acting agents such as laxatives (e.g., osmotic laxatives and chloride channel activators) to control transient constipation. Such structured withdrawal programs have been prospectively evaluated in small clinical trials and have met with considerable success in the short term.

conclusionsBecause rates of NBS are likely to rise, integrated intensive pharmacotherapy and psychosocial interventions are needed to help patients with NBS go off and stay off opioids. These programs will likely also reduce comorbid psychopathology and lead to adequate pain control and improved quality of life.

Identifiers

PMID25207609
OpenAlexW2110574717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.