ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2014
Comparison of three skin closure methods in knee mid-anterior incisions.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew clinical trials have studied the functional and cosmetic outcomes using different closure techniques for surgical incisions. Since wound and rupture closure methods may influence the healing process and cosmetic outcome, the present study aims at comparing three different suture techniques.
methodsIn a clinical trial, sixty patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture were studied. At the end of the operation and after subcutaneous tissue closure, the skin incision was divided into three equal parts. Each part was randomly sutured using one of three techniques: simple, vertical mattress, or semisubcuticular suture techniques. After six months follow-up, we take a picture of the healed wound in each individual. The cosmetic outcome was rated and evaluated by three Orthopedic Surgeons according to the visual analogue scale (zero to 10). During the study, wounds were followed up for inflammation, infection, or discharges.
resultsThere were no significant differences between cosmetic results of different suturing methods. The mean and standard deviation of VAS scores for three different observer were 5.62±1.39, 5.62±1.13, 5.65±1.29 in the simple suture; 6.05±1.33, 6.13±1.01, 5.93±1.02 in the vertical mattress technique and 5.72±1.82, 5.81±097 and 5.77±0.99 in the semisubcutaneous method. Overall agreements between observers were weak to moderate. Slight superiority of the semisubcuticular sutures were not statistically significant.
conclusionsThe methods used for suturing an anterior midline incision of the knee does not seem to affect the final cosmetic outcome. The concept of different surgeons from a favorable cosmetic result could totally differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25207326PMC4151448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.