Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25207326›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2014

Comparison of three skin closure methods in knee mid-anterior incisions.

Amir Mohammad Navali, Ali Tabrizi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Comparison of Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amir Mohammad NavaliAmir Mohammad Navali MD, Shahid Ghazi Teaching Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali TabriziAmir Mohammad Navali MD, Shahid Ghazi Teaching Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew clinical trials have studied the functional and cosmetic outcomes using different closure techniques for surgical incisions. Since wound and rupture closure methods may influence the healing process and cosmetic outcome, the present study aims at comparing three different suture techniques.

methodsIn a clinical trial, sixty patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture were studied. At the end of the operation and after subcutaneous tissue closure, the skin incision was divided into three equal parts. Each part was randomly sutured using one of three techniques: simple, vertical mattress, or semisubcuticular suture techniques. After six months follow-up, we take a picture of the healed wound in each individual. The cosmetic outcome was rated and evaluated by three Orthopedic Surgeons according to the visual analogue scale (zero to 10). During the study, wounds were followed up for inflammation, infection, or discharges.

resultsThere were no significant differences between cosmetic results of different suturing methods. The mean and standard deviation of VAS scores for three different observer were 5.62±1.39, 5.62±1.13, 5.65±1.29 in the simple suture; 6.05±1.33, 6.13±1.01, 5.93±1.02 in the vertical mattress technique and 5.72±1.82, 5.81±097 and 5.77±0.99 in the semisubcutaneous method. Overall agreements between observers were weak to moderate. Slight superiority of the semisubcuticular sutures were not statistically significant.

conclusionsThe methods used for suturing an anterior midline incision of the knee does not seem to affect the final cosmetic outcome. The concept of different surgeons from a favorable cosmetic result could totally differ.

Indexed as

ClosureCosmeticKnee surgerySuture technique

Identifiers

PMID25207326
PMCPMC4151448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.