Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25207071›Full record

ArticleBalkan medical journal2013

Evaluation of the efficacy of aprepitant on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and quality of life with functional living index emesis.

Görkem Aksu, Ilhan Dolaşık, Fatih Ensaroğlu, Selçuk Y Sener, Faden H Aydın, Süleyman Temiz, Doğu Canoğlu, Kazım Uygun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Balkan medical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Görkem AksuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Ilhan DolaşıkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Fatih EnsaroğluDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Selçuk Y SenerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Faden H AydınDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Süleyman TemizDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Doğu CanoğluDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Kazım UygunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFunctional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) is developed to evaluate the relationship between emesis and it's effects on patient's daily life and is far more relevant to detect the effectiveness of antiemetic treatment compared with self-diary reports. In this study, the efficacy of oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and quality of life is evaluated with FLIE. STUDY

designCross sectional study. MATERIAL AND

methodsSixty patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) receiving a chemotherapy regimen consisting of Cisplatin and Docetaxel were evaluated. The patients were prospectively randomized to two groups before the first cycle of chemotherapy. Patients in Group A (31 patients) received 3 daily doses of aprepitant along with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone. The patients in group B (29 patients) received only ondansetron and dexamathasone. The efficacy of both regimens was evaluated by a modified Turkish version of FLIE scale consisting of 18 questions.

resultsThe number of patients with complete response was 31 in the whole group. Of these 18 patients (58%) were in Group A (Aprepitant) and 13 patients in group B (42%). Median FLIE score in group A was 24.97 (±12.45) while it was 38.1 (±26.987) in group B and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.022). Total score >20 was seen in only 5 of 31 patients in aprepitant group (16%) showing the significant efficiency of aprepitant on quality of life, while in group B, 13 of 29 patients (44%) had total scores >20 (p=0.02).

conclusionRegarding these findings, it is certain to state that aprepitant in combination with other drugs optimizes protection against both nausea and vomiting compared to the prior standard of care, and must be recommended as first-line therapy for patients who are treated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AprepitantchemotherapyemezisFLIEquality-of life

Identifiers

PMID25207071
PMCPMC4116033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.