Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25206965›Full record

ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2010

Gynaecological aspects of the treatment and follow-up of transsexual men and women.

S Weyers, P De Sutter, S Hoebeke, G Monstrey, G 'T Sjoen, H Verstraelen, J Gerris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking prostate cancer screening in transgender women Bridging the gap in inclusive healthcare.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Case - Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a transgender woman after gender-affirming vaginoplasty.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Do we urologists know enough about gender minorities with prostate cancer?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S WeyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
P De SutterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
S HoebekeDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
G MonstreyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
G 'T SjoenDepartment of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
H VerstraelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
J GerrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the gynaecologist in the treatment of female-to-male transsexual patients is largely confined to hysterectomy and vaginectomy. We showed that laparoscopic hysterectomy is feasible and safe in this group. When surgery is not performed completely, follow-up of the remaining organs is necessary. The major part of this thesis deals with the necessity and acceptability of gynaecological follow-up in male-to-female (MTF) transsexual patients. These patients function well on a physical, emotional, psychological and social level. Sexual function was less satisfactory, especially concerning arousal, lubrication and pain. Typical gynaecological exams proved to be feasible and well accepted. Transvaginal palpation of the prostate is of poor clinical value, in contrast to transvaginal ultrasound. Mammography was judged almost painless and 98% of transsexual women intend to return for screening. Since there is uncertainty about breast cancer risk in transsexual women, we conclude that breast screening in this population should not differ from that in biological women. Microflora and cytology of the penile skin-lined neovagina of transsexual women were described for the first time. Vaginal lactobacilli were largely lacking. A mixed microflora of aerobe and anaerobe species, usually found on skin, in bowel or in bacterial vaginosis microflora, was encountered. No high-grade cervical lesions were found, however, one patient displayed a low-grade lesion (positive for HR-HPV with koilocytes). Finally, low bone mass was highly prevalent in our study group. This finding appeared to be largely determined, in comparison to healthy males, by smaller bone size and a strikingly lower muscle mass.

Indexed as

Gender identityhysterectomymammographyosteoporosisprostatesexual behaviourtranssexualismvaginal diseases

Identifiers

PMID25206965
PMCPMC4154336
OpenAlexW1640045700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.