Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25206948›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2014

The mental health of the UK Armed Forces: where facts meet fiction.

Elizabeth J F Hunt, Simon Wessely, Norman Jones, Roberto J Rona, Neil Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Returning home from a full-scale armed conflict: A rapid review of short post-deployment psychological practices.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Review
  8. Mental health of Canadian Armed Forces Veterans: Review of population studies.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A service evaluation of self-referral to military mental health teams.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Prevalence of Past-Year Mental Disorders in the Canadian Armed Forces, 2002-2013.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth J F HuntAcademic Centre for Defence Mental Health (ACDMH), King's College London, Western Education Centre, London, UK.
Simon WesselyKing's Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR), King's College London, Western Education Centre, London, UK.
Norman JonesAcademic Centre for Defence Mental Health (ACDMH), King's College London, Western Education Centre, London, UK.
Roberto J RonaKing's Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR), King's College London, Western Education Centre, London, UK.
Neil GreenbergAcademic Centre for Defence Mental Health (ACDMH), King's College London, Western Education Centre, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial amount of research has been conducted into the mental health of the UK military in recent years. This article summarises the results of the various studies and offers possible explanations for differences in findings between the UK and other allied nations. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) rates are perhaps surprisingly low amongst British forces, with prevalence rates of around 4% in personnel who have deployed, rising to 6% in combat troops, despite the high tempo of operations in recent years. The rates in personnel currently on operations are consistently lower than these. Explanations for the lower PTSD prevalence in British troops include variations in combat exposures, demographic differences, higher leader to enlisted soldier ratios, shorter operational tour lengths and differences in access to long-term health care between countries. Delayed-onset PTSD was recently found to be more common than previously supposed, accounting for nearly half of all PTSD cases; however, many of these had sub-syndromal PTSD predating the onset of the full disorder. Rates of common mental health disorders in UK troops are similar or higher to those of the general population, and overall operational deployments are not associated with an increase in mental health problems in UK regular forces. However, there does appear to be a correlation between both deployment and increased alcohol misuse and post-deployment violence in combat troops. Unlike for regular forces, there is an overall association between deployment and mental health problems in Reservists. There have been growing concerns regarding mild traumatic brain injury, though this appears to be low in British troops with an overall prevalence of 4.4% in comparison with 15% in the US military. The current strategies for detection and treatment of mental health problems in British forces are also described. The stance of the UK military is that psychological welfare of troops is primarily a chain of command responsibility, aided by medical advice when necessary, and to this end uses third location decompression, stress briefings, and Trauma Risk Management approaches. Outpatient treatment is provided by Field Mental Health Teams and military Departments of Community Mental Health, whilst inpatient care is given in specific NHS hospitals.

Indexed as

combatdelayed-onset PTSDmild traumatic brain injuryMilitarypost-traumatic stress disorderreservistsservice personnelTrauma Risk Managementveterans

Identifiers

PMID25206948
PMCPMC4138705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.