Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25206824›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2014

Time dependent integration of matrix metalloproteinases and their targeted substrates directs axonal sprouting and synaptogenesis following central nervous system injury.

Linda L Phillips, Julie L Chan, Adele E Doperalski, Thomas M Reeves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prolonged release of VEGF and Ang1 from intralesionally implanted hydrogel promotes perilesional vascularization and functional recovery after experimental ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Matrix metalloproteinase signals following neurotrauma are right on cue.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda L PhillipsDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Julie L ChanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Adele E DoperalskiDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Thomas M ReevesDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Extracellular Matrix Mediates Axonal Integrity Following Brain TraumaR01NS056247 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, LINDA L. · 2007 to 2017
$3.4M
New Approaches to Axonal Protection After TBIR01NS057758 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI REEVES, THOMAS M. · 2007 to 2017
$3.3M
Matrix Metalloproteinases and Regenerative Plasticity Following Brain InjuryR01NS044372 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, LINDA L. · 2002 to 2011
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044372NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056247NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, many investigators have reported how extracellular matrix molecules act to regulate neuroplasticity. The majority of these studies involve proteins which are targets of matrix metalloproteinases. Importantly, these enzyme/substrate interactions can regulate degenerative and regenerative phases of synaptic plasticity, directing axonal and dendritic reorganization after brain insult. The present review first summarizes literature support for the prominent role of matrix metalloproteinases during neuroregeneration, followed by a discussion of data contrasting adaptive and maladaptive neuroplasticity that reveals time-dependent metalloproteinase/substrate regulation of postinjury synaptic recovery. The potential for these enzymes to serve as therapeutic targets for enhanced neuroplasticity after brain injury is illustrated with experiments demonstrating that metalloproteinase inhibitors can alter adaptive and maladaptive outcome. Finally, the complexity of metalloproteinase role in reactive synaptogenesis is revealed in new studies showing how these enzymes interact with immune molecules to mediate cellular response in the local regenerative environment, and are regulated by novel binding partners in the brain extracellular matrix. Together, these different examples show the complexity with which metalloproteinases are integrated into the process of neuroregeneration, and point to a promising new angle for future studies exploring how to facilitate brain plasticity.

Indexed as

adaptive and maladaptive neuroplasticitybrain injurylipocalin 2matrix metalloproteinasesmetalloproteinase inhibitionneuroregenerationosteopontinreactive synaptogenesis

Identifiers

PMID25206824
PMCPMC4146196
OpenAlexW1964162861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.