Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25206341›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2014

Endothelial dysfunction as a nexus for endothelial cell-cardiomyocyte miscommunication.

Thorsten M Leucker, Steven P Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cells, Materials, and Fabrication Processes for Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Cardiomyocyte-SpecificJournal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thorsten M LeuckerDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
Steven P JonesDepartment of Medicine - Cardiovascular, Institute of Molecular Cardiology, and Diabetes and Obesity Center, School of Medicine, University of Louisville Louisville, KY, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Tumor Necrosis Factor Modulation of CPCsP01HL078825 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2005 to 2021
$37.6M
Project 5 - Metabolomic Analysis of AtherothrombosisP20GM103492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HONG, KYUNG UK · 2012 to 2017
$13.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078825NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies of the heart focus on cardiomyocytes (CM) at the exclusion of other cell types such as myocardial endothelial cells (EC). Such mono-cellular approaches propagate the presumption that EC provide a mere "passive lining" or supportive role. In fact, EC contribute to a dynamic network regulating vascular tone, cardiac development, and repair. Two distinct EC types, vascular EC and epicardial EC, possess important structural and signaling properties within both the healthy and diseased myocardium. In this review, we address EC-CM interactions in mature, healthy myocardium, followed by a discussion of diseases characterized by EC dysfunction. Finally, we consider strategies to reverse EC-CM "miscommunication" to improve patients' outcomes in various cardiovascular diseases.

Indexed as

cardiomyocytecardiovascular diseaseendothelial functionjuxtacrine communicationparacrine factors

Identifiers

PMID25206341
PMCPMC4144117
OpenAlexW2154185420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.