SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
S-1-based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- S-1 and 5-Fluorouracil-related adverse events in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- The clinical outcomes of S-1 plus cisplatin for patients with advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Management of advanced gastric cancer: An overview of major findings from meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016Pooled it
- A Meta-analysis Reveals S-1-based Chemotherapy Improves the Survival of Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Clinical Benefit and Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Treated with Cisplatin/S-1 Versus Cisplatin/5-FU: Secondary End Point Results From the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study (FLAGS).Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2015Trial
- MicrobeRX: a tool for enzymatic-reaction-based metabolite prediction in the gut microbiome.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Practical Consensus Guidelines for the Use of S-1 in GI Malignancies.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Proposal of a Scoring Scale to Estimate Risk of the Discontinuation of S-1 Adjuvant Monotherapy in Patients with Stage II to III Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Dataset Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2019Article
- The Use of (Network) Meta-Analysis in Clinical Oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Between evidence and new perspectives on the current state of the multimodal approach to gastric cancer: Is there still a role for radiation therapy?World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Review
- Efficacy and safety comparison of chemotherapies for advanced gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Phase I study of orally administered S-1 in combination with epirubicin and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors and chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic esophagogastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017Article
- Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2016Article
- Chemoradiation therapy with S-1 for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: report of three cases.Surgical case reports · 2015Article
- Emerging role of S-1 in gastric cancer.Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric OncologyReview
- S-1 maintenance therapy in advanced gastric cancer without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the efficacy and tolerability of S-1-based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
methodsWe extracted reported endpoints, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects, from randomized controlled trials identified in PubMed, the Cochrane library, Science Direct, EMBASE and American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings. Stata software was used to calculate the pooled values.
resultsSeven randomized controlled trials involving 2176 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to non-S-1-based regimens, the use of S-1-based regimens were associated with an increase in ORR (RR = 1.300; 95%CI: 1.028-1.645); OS (HR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.81-0.99; P = 0.025), TTF (HR = 0.83; 95%CI: 0.75-0.92; P = 0.000), and a lower risk of febrile neutropenia (RR = 0.225; P = 0.000) and stomatitis (RR = 0.230; P = 0.032). OS, PFS and TTF were prolonged, especially in the Asian population. In subgroup analysis, statistically significant increases in ORR (RR = 1.454; P = 0.029), OS (HR = 0.895; P = 0.041) and TTF (HR = 0.832; P = 0.000) were found when S-1-based chemotherapy was compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. The incidence of leukopenia (RR = 0.584; P = 0.002) and stomatitis (RR = 0.230; P = 0.032) was higher in the 5-FU-based arm. S-1-based regimens had no advantage in ORR, OS, PFS, TTF and grade 3 or 4 adverse events over capecitabine-based regimens.
conclusionS-1-based chemotherapy may be a good choice for AGC because of longer survival times, better tolerance and more convenient use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.