Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25206295›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Influence of a probiotic mixture on antibiotic induced microbiota disturbances.

Sofia Forssten, Malkanthi Evans, Dale Wilson, Arthur C Ouwehand

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Antibiotic-perturbed microbiota and the role of probiotics.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofia ForsstenSofia Forssten, Arthur C Ouwehand, Active Nutrition, DuPont Nutrition & Health, 02460 Kantvik, Finland.
Malkanthi EvansSofia Forssten, Arthur C Ouwehand, Active Nutrition, DuPont Nutrition & Health, 02460 Kantvik, Finland.
Dale WilsonSofia Forssten, Arthur C Ouwehand, Active Nutrition, DuPont Nutrition & Health, 02460 Kantvik, Finland.
Arthur C OuwehandSofia Forssten, Arthur C Ouwehand, Active Nutrition, DuPont Nutrition & Health, 02460 Kantvik, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the effect of probiotic consumption on the faecal microbiota during and after antibiotic exposure.

methodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study with a two species probiotic combination [Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) ATCC 700396 and Bifidobacterium lactis (B. lactis) ATCC SD5220] on healthy adults during and after antibiotic treatment (amoxicillin 875 and 125 mg clavulanate). The dominant faecal microbiota was studied by real time-polymerase chain reaction to determine if this probiotic preparation could facilitate restoring the microbiota to its pre-antibiotic state and influence the prevalence of beta-lactam resistance. Gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded by questionnaire and Bristol stool scale.

resultsSubjects on the probiotic combination had significantly higher faecal counts of L. acidophilus ATCC 700396 and B. lactis at day 8 (end of antibiotic treatment period) vs those on placebo. Furthermore, subjects on the probiotic combination had significantly higher faecal counts of L. acidophilus ATCC 700396 and B. lactis at Day 15 (end of probiotic treatment) vs those on placebo. Lactobacillus counts remained stable in the probiotic group over the course of the study, while Clostridium XIV group was higher at the end of the study and closer to baseline levels; this in contrast to the placebo group. Beta-lactam resistance in creased after antibiotic exposure and was not different between both treatment groups. Gastrointestinal symptoms were generally mild and did not differ between the treatment groups, which correlates with the generally small changes in the microbiota.

conclusionConsumption of the probiotic combination mainly leads to an increase in the faecal levels of the species included in the preparation.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactam ResistanceBifidobacteriumDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleHumansIntestinesLactobacillus acidophilusMaleMedication AdherenceMicrobiotaProbioticsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAmoxicillin/clavulanateAntibiotic treatmentBeta-lactamasesBifidobacterium lactisLactobacillus acidophilusMicrobiotaProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID25206295
PMCPMC4155381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.