Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25205619›Full record

Trial reportPhytotherapy research : PTR2015

Tolerance of Phellodendron amurense bark extract (Nexrutine®) in patients with human prostate cancer.

Gregory P Swanson, William E Jones, Chul S Ha, Carol A Jenkins, Addanki Pratap Kumar, Joseph Basler

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Updated and Comprehensive Review ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antiproliferative Effect ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Extracting the Benefit of NexrutineCurrent pharmacology reports · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregory P SwansonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA; South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
William E Jones
Chul S Ha
Carol A Jenkins
Addanki Pratap Kumar
Joseph Basler

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Oxidative stress and programmed death pathways: Cross talk in pancreatic cancerR01AT007448 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KUMAR, ADDANKI PRATAP · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Akt/CREB signaling: Target for prostate cancerI01BX000766 · VA · SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI KUMAR, ADDANKI PRATAP · 2011 to 2013
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000766NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT007448NCI NIH HHS CA054174NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174PHS HHS 1ULTR001120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phellodendron amurense bark extract (Nexrutine®) has shown a favorable effect on prostate cancer in vivo and in vitro. We evaluated its tolerance in patients undergoing surgery or radiation for prostate cancer. Patients received Nexrutine® orally (500 mg tid) either 1 to 2 months preoperatively or 1 to 2 months prior to and with radiation therapy. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were used to measure tolerance. In total, 21 patients (9 surgery and 12 radiation) underwent treatment. During the Nexrutine® alone component, there were two transient grade 3 toxicities (hypokalemia and urinary incontinence). There was no grade 4 toxicity. For the combined Nexrutine® and radiation component, no additional patients suffered a grade 3 toxicity. All the toxicities were transient. By the end of the neoadjuvant treatment, 81% of the patients had a decline in prostate-specific antigen. This is the first report of patients with prostate cancer being treated with P. amurense bark extract, and it was very well tolerated. Toxicities were minimal and self-limited. This compound can be safely used in further evaluation of a treatment effect on cancer.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhellodendronPlant BarkPlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsNexrutinePlant ExtractsProstate-Specific Antigencombined modalityNexrutine®Phellodendron amurense extractprostate cancerprostatectomyradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID25205619
PMCPMC4507270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.