Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25205304›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental neurobiology2015

Dynamic variation in forebrain estradiol levels during song learning.

Andrew Chao, Ashley Paon, Luke Remage-Healey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Non-sensory Influences on Auditory Learning and Plasticity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Review
  3. A neural circuit perspective on brain aromatase.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acute neuroestrogen blockade attenuates song-induced immediate early gene expression in auditory regions of male and female zebra finches.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Actions of Steroids: New Neurotransmitters.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Brain estrogen production and the encoding of recent experience.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew ChaoNeuroscience and Behavior Program, Center for Neuroendocrine Studies, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003.
Ashley Paon
Luke Remage-Healey
University of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Modulation of forebrain circuits by local neurosteroid productionR00NS066179 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI REMAGE-HEALEY, LUKE R · 2010 to 2012
$721k
NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS066179NINDS NIH HHS R00NS066179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogens shape brain circuits during development, and the capacity to synthesize estrogens locally has consequences for both sexual differentiation and the acute modulation of circuits during early learning. A recently optimized method to detect and quantify fluctuations in brain estrogens in vivo provides a direct means to explore how brain estrogen production contributes to both differentiation and neuromodulation during development. Here, we use this method to test the hypothesis that neuroestrogens are sexually differentiated as well as dynamically responsive to song tutoring (via passive video/audio playback) during the period of song learning in juvenile zebra finches. Our results show that baseline neuroestradiol levels in the caudal forebrain do not differ between males and females during an early critical masculinization window. Instead, we observe a prominent difference between males and females in baseline neuroestradiol that emerges during the subadult stage as animals approach sexual maturity. Second, we observe that fluctuating neuroestradiol levels during periods of passive song tutoring exhibit a markedly different profile in juveniles as compared to adults. Specifically, neuroestrogens in the caudal forebrain are elevated following (rather than during) tutor song exposure in both juvenile males and females, suggesting an important role for the early consolidation of tutor song memories. These results further reveal a circadian influence on the fluctuations in local neuroestrogens during sensory/cognitive tasks. Taken together, these findings uncover several unexpected features of brain estrogen synthesis in juvenile animals that may have implications for secondary masculinization as well as the consolidation of recent sensory experiences.

Indexed as

MusicAcoustic StimulationAge FactorsAnimalsEstradiolFemaleFinchesLearningMaleMemoryNeuronsProsencephalonSex FactorsVocalization, AnimalEstradiolcortexmemoryneuromodulationnongenomicsex differencessong system

Identifiers

PMID25205304
PMCPMC4324334
OpenAlexW1754723039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.