Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25205186›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2014

[Osteosarcoma: reliability and quality of the information in the internet].

Michael Schippinger, Paul Ruckenstuhl, Jörg Friesenbichler, Andreas Leithner

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael SchippingerUniversitätsklinik für Orthopädie und orthopädische Chirurgie, LHK Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5-7, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
Paul Ruckenstuhl
Jörg Friesenbichler
Andreas Leithner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Wide Web has grown during the last years to a considerable source of medical information for experts as well as for laymen and patients. The quality of this information is subjected to some limitation linked with the structure of the Internet and the management of Internet pages. The cross- sectional study presented evaluates and compares quality and reliability of information with respect of osteosarcoma in the most common German-language Internet pages for medical information. As both, one of the most common primary malignant bone tumors and its peak of incidence at the age of childhood and youth, osteosarcoma is considered of significant importance in orthopedic oncology.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAustriaConsumer Health InformationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.