ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2014
Apoptosis induction and anti-cancer activity of LeciPlex formulations.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrent UBE3C-LRP5 translocations in head and neck cancer with therapeutic implications.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Spironolactone-Loaded LeciPlexes as Potential Topical Delivery Systems for Female Acne: In Vitro Appraisal and Ex Vivo Skin Permeability Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Metformin and epithelial ovarian cancer therapeutics.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCationic agents have been reported to possess anti-neoplastic properties against various cancer cell types. However, their complexes with lipids appear to interact differently with different cancer cells. The purpose of this study was to (i) design and generate novel cationic lecithin nanoparticles, (ii) assess and understand the mechanism underlying their putative cytotoxicity and (iii) test their effect on cell cycle progression in various cancer-derived cell lines. In addition, we aimed to evaluate the in vivo potential of these newly developed nanoparticles in oral anti-cancer delivery.
methodsCationic lecithin nanoparticles were generated using a single step nanoprecipitation method and they were characterized for particle size, zeta potential, stability and in vitro release. Their cytotoxic potential was assessed using a sulforhodamine B assay, and their effect on cell cycle progression was evaluated using flow cytometry. The nanoparticle systems were also tested in vivo for their anti-tumorigenic potential.
resultsIn contrast to cationic agents alone, the newly developed nanoformulations showed a specific toxicity against cancer cells. The mechanism of toxic cell death included apoptosis, S and G2/M cell cycle phase arrest, depending on the type of cationic agent and the cancer-derived cell line used. Both blank and drug-loaded systems exhibited significant anti-cancer activity, suggesting a synergistic anti-tumorigenic effect of the drug and its delivery system.
conclusionsBoth in vitro and in vivo data indicate that cationic agents themselves exhibit broad anti-neoplastic activities. Complex formation of the cationic agents with phospholipids was found to provide specificity to the anti-cancer activity. These formulations thus possess potential for the design of effective anti-cancer delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.