Trial reportParticle and fibre toxicology2014
Effects of ultrafine particles on the allergic inflammation in the lung of asthmatics: results of a double-blinded randomized cross-over clinical pilot study.
Trial report in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00527462 (Mono-Center, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study to Explore the Effects of Two Hour Inhalation of Ultrafine Carbon Black Particles Versus Filtered Air on Airway Inflammation Induced by Segmental Allergen Challenge in Asthmatics), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mono-Center, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study to Explore the Effects of Two Hour Inhalation of Ultrafine Carbon Black Particles Versus Filtered Air on Airway Inflammation Induced by Segmental Allergen Challenge in Asthmatics
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrafine particles and ozone perturb norepinephrine clearance rather than centrally generated sympathetic activity in humans.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- External Environmental Pollution as a Risk Factor for Asthma.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- A BioinspiredFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Inhaled nanomaterials and the respiratory microbiome: clinical, immunological and toxicological perspectives.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2018Review
- Low Dose Carbon Black Nanoparticle Exposure Does Not Aggravate Allergic Airway Inflammation in Mice Irrespective of the Presence of Surface Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Mechanistic insight into the impact of nanomaterials on asthma and allergic airway disease.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2017Review
- A work group report on ultrafine particles (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology): Why ambient ultrafine and engineered nanoparticles should receive special attention for possible adverse health outcomes in human subjects.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2016Review
- No involvement of alveolar macrophages in the initiation of carbon nanoparticle induced acute lung inflammation in mice.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2016Article
- Exposure to urban PM1 in rats: development of bronchial inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness.Respiratory research · 2016Article
- Preventing carbon nanoparticle-induced lung inflammation reduces antigen-specific sensitization and subsequent allergic reactions in a mouse model.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidemiological and experimental studies suggest that exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP) might aggravate the allergic inflammation of the lung in asthmatics.
methodsWe exposed 12 allergic asthmatics in two subgroups in a double-blinded randomized cross-over design, first to freshly generated ultrafine carbon particles (64 μg/m³; 6.1 ± 0.4 × 10⁵ particles/cm³ for 2 h) and then to filtered air or vice versa with a 28-day recovery period in-between. Eighteen hours after each exposure, grass pollen was instilled into a lung lobe via bronchoscopy. Another 24 hours later, inflammatory cells were collected by means of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). (
trial registrationNCT00527462)
resultsFor the entire study group, inhalation of UFP by itself had no significant effect on the allergen induced inflammatory response measured with total cell count as compared to exposure with filtered air (p = 0.188). However, the subgroup of subjects, which inhaled UFP during the first exposure, exhibited a significant increase in total BAL cells (p = 0.021), eosinophils (p = 0.031) and monocytes (p = 0.013) after filtered air exposure and subsequent allergen challenge 28 days later. Additionally, the potential of BAL cells to generate oxidant radicals was significantly elevated at that time point. The subgroup that was exposed first to filtered air and 28 days later to UFP did not reveal differences between sessions.
conclusionsOur data demonstrate that pre-allergen exposure to UFP had no acute effect on the allergic inflammation. However, the subgroup analysis lead to the speculation that inhaled UFP particles might have a long-term effect on the inflammatory course in asthmatic patients. This should be reconfirmed in further studies with an appropriate study design and sufficient number of subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.