ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Stretch sphincter of the esophagus : Paradoxical sphincter with angiomyoelastic architecture].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Paradoxical sphincters and cardinal continence function of the gastric fundus].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Review
- [Surgery without anatomy?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Review
- [Paradoxical sphincters in the abdomen].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The investigations described in this article clearly show that the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) represents a variation of circular muscular occlusive mechanisms found elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. The LES is a double layer stretch sphincter that operates in an apparently paradoxical manner: it closes when under stretch but opens when the muscle fibers contract. Impedance manometry studies demonstrate that the entire esophagus is involved in the normal functioning of the esophagus as well as in esophageal disorders. The pronounced elasticity of esophageal tissue is a functional feature that has its basis in the singular architecture of elastic fibers located between the muscle layers. All traditional forms of operative treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) impede the natural functioning of the stretch sphincter to a greater or lesser degree by locking it up. The cause of GERD is mainly by contraction of the esophagus brought about by the cephalad transposition of the stretch sphincter segment into the chest. In a sense this is an incipient axial hernia that frequently remains undiagnosed in the early stages. The operative repositioning of the stretch sphincter segment into the abdominal cavity provides sufficient restoration of the natural topographic relationships to achieve a cure of GERD. Whether this straightforward repair restores the function of the entire esophagus remains to be elucidated. The concept of the stretch provides a good explanation of the pathophysiology of achalasia, a condition in which a paralyzed paradoxical ring sphincter remains occluded. Successful myotomy approaches only split the muscularis propria layer of the stretch sphincter while leaving subepithelial muscle fibers intact that remain paralyzed. This limited intervention provides a good relief of symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25204425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.