Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25204381›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2014

A systematic review of the implementation and impact of asthma protocols.

Judith W Dexheimer, Elizabeth M Borycki, Kou-Wei Chiu, Kevin B Johnson, Dominik Aronsky

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03239431 (A 3 Year Longitudinal Study of the Level of Asthma Control and Treatment of Asthma Patients in Hong Kong), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03239431 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A 3 Year Longitudinal Study of the Level of Asthma Control and Treatment of Asthma Patients in Hong Kong

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2017 to 2022Enrolled400ConditionsAsthmaArmsasthmatic exacerbation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Implementing PrEP Services in Diverse Health Care Settings.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Article
  12. Implementation of national childbirth guidelines in Brazil: barriers and strategies.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Asthma-related emergency department use: current perspectives.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith W DexheimerDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC 2008, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA. Judith.dexheimer@cchmc.org.
Elizabeth M Borycki
Kou-Wei Chiu
Kevin B Johnson
Dominik Aronsky

Funding

An Informatics-Based Guideline Implementation Framework for Asthma CareR21LM009747 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ARONSKY, DOMINIK · 2008 to 2009
$379k
NLM NIH HHS LM 009747-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is one of the most common childhood illnesses. Guideline-driven clinical care positively affects patient outcomes for care. There are several asthma guidelines and reminder methods for implementation to help integrate them into clinical workflow. Our goal is to determine the most prevalent method of guideline implementation; establish which methods significantly improved clinical care; and identify the factors most commonly associated with a successful and sustainable implementation.

methodsPUBMED (MEDLINE), OVID CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, and EMBASE. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they evaluated an asthma protocol or prompt, evaluated an intervention, a clinical trial of a protocol implementation, and qualitative studies as part of a protocol intervention. Studies were excluded if they had non-human subjects, were studies on efficacy and effectiveness of drugs, did not include an evaluation component, studied an educational intervention only, or were a case report, survey, editorial, letter to the editor.

resultsFrom 14,478 abstracts, we included 101 full-text articles in the analysis. The most frequent study design was pre-post, followed by prospective, population based case series or consecutive case series, and randomized trials. Paper-based reminders were the most frequent with fully computerized, then computer generated, and other modalities. No study reported a decrease in health care practitioner performance or declining patient outcomes. The most common primary outcome measure was compliance with provided or prescribing guidelines, key clinical indicators such as patient outcomes or quality of life, and length of stay.

conclusionsPaper-based implementations are by far the most popular approach to implement a guideline or protocol. The number of publications on asthma protocol reminder systems is increasing. The number of computerized and computer-generated studies is also increasing. Asthma guidelines generally improved patient care and practitioner performance regardless of the implementation method.

Indexed as

AsthmaClinical ProtocolsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicReminder Systems

Identifiers

PMID25204381
PMCPMC4174371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.