Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25203877›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2014

Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Judy C Boughey, Linda M McCall, Karla V Ballman, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Gretchen M Ahrendt, Lee G Wilke, Bret Taback, A Marilyn Leitch, Teresa Flippo-Morton, Kelly K Hunt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04882371 (Comparison of MRI With PET / CT in the Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on the Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 197 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04882371 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of MRI With PET / CT in the Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on the Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorCem Ilgin ErolRan2018 to 2020Enrolled88ConditionsBreast Cancer, Chemotherapy EffectArmsChemotherapy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron emission tomography - Copmputer Tomography (PET-CT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 424 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Judy C Boughey*Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN †Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC ‡Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN §Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston ¶Department of Surgery, Magee-Women's Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA ‖Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison **Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NY ††Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; and ‡‡Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
Linda M McCall
Karla V Ballman
Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Gretchen M Ahrendt
Lee G Wilke
Bret Taback
A Marilyn Leitch
Teresa Flippo-Morton
Kelly K Hunt
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDuke University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP B STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA033601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARGENT, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$69.4M
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ONCOLOGY TRIALS GROUPU10CA076001 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1998 to 2013
$62.1M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
Naional Cancer Institute, Naitonal Clinical Trials Network U10 Lead Academic SiteU10CA180790 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALBERTS, STEVEN R, BOUGHEY, JUDY CAROLINE · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA076001NCI NIH HHS CA31946NCI NIH HHS CA33601NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA033601NCI NIH HHS U10 CA076001NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180790NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the impact of tumor biology on rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

backgroundThe impact of tumor biology on the rate of breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been well studied.

methodsWe used data from ACOSOG Z1071, a prospective, multicenter study assessing sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer from 2009 through 2011, to determine rates of breast-conserving surgery and pCR after chemotherapy by approximated biologic subtype.

resultsOf the 756 patients enrolled on Z1071, 694 had findings available from pathologic review of breast and axillary specimens from surgery after chemotherapy. Approximated subtype was triple-negative in 170 (24.5%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive in 207 (29.8%), and hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative in 317 (45.7%) patients. Patient age, clinical tumor and nodal stage at presentation did not differ across subtypes. Rates of breast-conserving surgery were significantly higher in patients with triple-negative (46.8%) and HER2-positive tumors (43.0%) than in those with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative tumors (34.5%) (P = 0.019). Rates of pCR in both the breast and axilla were 38.2% in triple-negative, 45.4% in HER2-positive, and 11.4% in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease (P < 0.0001). Rates of pCR in the breast only and the axilla only exhibited similar differences across tumor subtypes.

conclusionsPatients with triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers have the highest rates of breast-conserving surgery and pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with these subtypes are most likely to be candidates for less invasive surgical approaches after chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMastectomy, SegmentalNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25203877
PMCPMC4159769
OpenAlexW2326824641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.