Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25203483›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2014

Participant uptake of the fecal immunochemical test decreases with the two-sample regimen compared with one-sample FIT.

David M Mosen, Elizabeth G Liles, Adrianne C Feldstein, Nancy Perrin, Anna G Rosales, Erin Keast, David H Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M MosenaCenter for Health Research bNorthwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Elizabeth G Liles
Adrianne C Feldstein
Nancy Perrin
Anna G Rosales
Erin Keast
David H Smith
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Maximizing yield of the fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screeningR01CA154982 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LILES, ELIZABETH GRACE · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154982NCI NIH HHS R01CA154982-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are recommended to screen average-risk adults for colorectal cancer (CRC). Little research has examined whether a two-sample FIT affects participant uptake, compared with a one-sample FIT. Examining participant uptake is important, as evidence suggests that a two-sample FIT may increase the sensitivity to detect CRC.

objectiveThis study had two objectives: (i) to evaluate FIT completion in a population that received either a one-sample FIT kit (1-FIT) or a two-sample FIT kit (2-FIT) and (ii) to understand whether uptake varies by age, sex, or receipt of prior CRC screening.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 3081 participants who were aged between 50 and 75 years and were at an average risk for CRC, and who had requested FITs, randomly received 1-FIT (n=1540) or 2-FIT (n=1541) kits. FIT completion was defined as the completion and return of a one-sample test by the patients in the 1-FIT group or of both sample tests by those in the 2-FIT group. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the independent effect of group type (2-FIT vs. 1-FIT) on the completion of the FIT, adjusting for age, sex, and receipt of prior CRC screening.

resultsThe 2-FIT group had lower test completion rates (hazard ratio=0.87; 95% confidence interval=0.78-0.97; P=0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, and receipt of prior CRC screening. Participant uptake did not vary by age, sex, or receipt of prior CRC screening.

conclusionThis unique, rigorous randomized controlled trial found that the 2-FIT regimen decreases completion of FIT. Further research is needed to understand whether decreases in participant uptake are offset by increased gains in test sensitivity.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAgedColorectal NeoplasmsData CollectionEarly Detection of CancerFecesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPostal ServiceReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID25203483
PMCPMC4186737
OpenAlexW2034316060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.