Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25203426›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Towards long term cultivation of Drosophila wing imaginal discs in vitro.

Björn Handke, János Szabad, Peter V Lidsky, Ernst Hafen, Christian F Lehner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Calcium Imaging in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cultivation and Live Imaging of Drosophila Imaginal Discs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Generating and working with Drosophila cell cultures: Current challenges and opportunities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Cells · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Björn HandkeInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
János SzabadDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Peter V LidskyInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ernst HafenDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology (IMSB), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian F LehnerInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences (IMLS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wing imaginal disc of Drosophila melanogaster is a prominent experimental system for research on control of cell growth, proliferation and death, as well as on pattern formation and morphogenesis during organogenesis. The precise genetic methodology applicable in this system has facilitated conceptual advances of fundamental importance for developmental biology. Experimental accessibility and versatility would gain further if long term development of wing imaginal discs could be studied also in vitro. For example, culture systems would allow live imaging with maximal temporal and spatial resolution. However, as clearly demonstrated here, standard culture methods result in a rapid cell proliferation arrest within hours of cultivation of dissected wing imaginal discs. Analysis with established markers for cells in S- and M phase, as well as with RGB cell cycle tracker, a novel reporter transgene, revealed that in vitro cultivation interferes with cell cycle progression throughout interphase and not just exclusively during G1. Moreover, quantification of EGFP expression from an inducible transgene revealed rapid adverse effects of disc culture on basic cellular functions beyond cell cycle progression. Disc transplantation experiments confirmed that these detrimental consequences do not reflect fatal damage of imaginal discs during isolation, arguing clearly for a medium insufficiency. Alternative culture media were evaluated, including hemolymph, which surrounds imaginal discs during growth in situ. But isolated larval hemolymph was found to be even less adequate than current culture media, presumably as a result of conversion processes during hemolymph isolation or disc culture. The significance of prominent growth-regulating pathways during disc culture was analyzed, as well as effects of insulin and disc co-culture with larval tissues as potential sources of endocrine factors. Based on our analyses, we developed a culture protocol that prolongs cell proliferation in cultured discs.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCoculture TechniquesCulture MediaDevelopmental BiologyDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHemolymphImaginal DiscsIn Vitro TechniquesLarvaMorphogenesisWings, AnimalCulture MediaDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25203426
PMCPMC4159298
OpenAlexW2085553596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.