Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25203298›Full record

ArticleApplied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM2014

Predictive biomarkers and companion diagnostics. The future of immunohistochemistry: "in situ proteomics," or just a "stain"?

Clive R Taylor

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cancer: A pathologist's journey from morphology to molecular.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Epitope recognition in the human-pig comparison model on fixed and embedded material.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Clive R TaylorDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Retrieval of DNA, RNA, and Protein from Archival TissueR33CA103455 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAYLOR, CLIVE R · 2003 to 2005
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA103455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DiagnosisProteomicsBiomarkersHumansImmunohistochemistryPredictive Value of TestsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25203298
PMCPMC4215952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.