Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25202986›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2015

"We have to try and have this child before it is too late": missed opportunities in client-provider communication on reproductive intentions of people living with HIV.

D L Mindry, T L Crankshaw, P Maharaj, C Munthree, T Letsoalo, C Milford, R M Greener, L Rambally, S Carpenter, J A Smit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Client and provider knowledge and views on safer conception for people living with HIV (PLHIV).Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D L Mindrya Center for Culture and Health , Semel Institute, University of California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
T L Crankshaw
P Maharaj
C Munthree
T Letsoalo
C Milford
R M Greener
L Rambally
S Carpenter
J A Smit

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MITSUYASU, RONALD T. · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
UC Global Health Inst Women's Health and Empowerment CoE Post-Doc Fellowship ProgR24TW008807 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COHEN, CRAIG R · 2010 to 2010
$416k
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008807FIC NIH HHS R24TW008807NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men and women living with HIV with access to ARVs are living longer, healthier lives that can and often do include bearing children. Children occupy a key space in men and women's personal and social lives and often play a fundamental role in maintaining these relationships, irrespective of illness concerns. Couples living with HIV need to balance prevention needs and ill-health while trying to maintain healthy relationships. Health-care providers serving the reproductive needs of HIV-affected couples need to consider the social and relational factors shaping reproductive decisions associated with periconception risk behaviors. This paper based on qualitative research at three hospital sites in eThekwini District, South Africa, investigates the childbearing intentions and needs of people living with HIV (PLHIV), and the attitudes and experiences of health-care providers serving the reproductive needs of PLHIV, and client and provider views and knowledge of safer conception. This research revealed that personal, social, and relationship dynamics shape the reproductive decisions of PLHIV, and "unplanned" pregnancies are not always unintended. Additionally, conception desires are not driven by the number of living children; rather clients are motivated by whether or not they have had any children with their current partner/spouse. Providers should consider the relationship status of clients in discussions about childbearing desires and intentions. Although many providers recognize the complex social realities shaping their clients' reproductive decisions, they have outdated information on serving their reproductive needs. Appropriate training to enable providers to better understand the relationship and social realities surrounding their clients' childbearing intentions is required and should be used as a platform for couples to work together with providers toward safer conception. The adoption of a more participatory approach should be employed to equalize client-provider power dynamics and to ensure clients are more involved in decision-making about reproduction and conception.

Indexed as

IntentionProfessional-Patient RelationsReproductionHIV InfectionsHumanshealth-care providerspeople living with HIVreproductive decision-makingsafer conceptionSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID25202986
PMCPMC4221488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.