ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2014
Effects of engineered nanomaterials on plants growth: an overview.
Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 433 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing agroecosystems through next-generation bio-nanofertilizers: an overview toward sustainable agriculture.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Development of biodegradable hydrogels with adjustable moisture retention capacity for agricultural applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biosynthesis and Characterization ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Greener synthesis of silver nanoparticles fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Magnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Applications in Life Sciences.ChemistryOpen · 2025Review
- Leveraging Nanotechnology for Safer Herbicide Use: Insights from Maize Tolerance to Nanoencapsulated Atrazine.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Silicon-Mediated Mitigation of Salt Stress in Maize Plants.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Nanomaterial-based encapsulation of biochemicals for targeted sepsis therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- The effect of foliar application of silver nanoparticles synthesized by Moringa oleifera on improving the yield and quality of Pelargonium hortorum under drought stress.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nano-selenium mitigates arsenate toxicity in soybean roots by modulating phenylalanine and salicylic acid pathways.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Nanoparticles alter the nature and strength of intraploidy and interploidy interactions in plants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Agricultural nanotechnology for a safe and sustainable future: current status, challenges, and beyond.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2025Review
- Chitosan Coating as a Strategy to Increase Postemergent Herbicidal Efficiency and Alter the Interaction of Nanoatrazine withACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Review
- Nanomaterials in Agriculture: A Pathway to Enhanced Plant Growth and Abiotic Stress Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Uptake, Translocation, Toxicity, and Impact of Nanoparticles on Plant Physiological Processes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Interactions Between Nanoparticles and Tomato Plants: Influencing Host Physiology and the Tomato Leafminer's Molecular Response.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Application of nanopesticides and its toxicity evaluation through Drosophila model.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2024Review
- Protocols for isolation and characterization of nanoparticle biomolecular corona complexes.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Innovative Approaches for Improving the Quality and Resilience of Spring Barley Seeds: The Role of Nanotechnology and Phytopathological Analysis.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid development and wide applications of nanotechnology brought about a significant increment on the number of engineered nanomaterials (ENs) inevitably entering our living system. Plants comprise of a very important living component of the terrestrial ecosystem. Studies on the influence of engineered nanomaterials (carbon and metal/metal oxides based) on plant growth indicated that in the excess content, engineered nanomaterials influences seed germination. It assessed the shoot-to-root ratio and the growth of the seedlings. From the toxicological studies to date, certain types of engineered nanomaterials can be toxic once they are not bound to a substrate or if they are freely circulating in living systems. It is assumed that the different types of engineered nanomaterials affect the different routes, behavior, and the capability of the plants. Furthermore, different, or even opposing conclusions, have been drawn from most studies on the interactions between engineered nanomaterials with plants. Therefore, this paper comprehensively reviews the studies on the different types of engineered nanomaterials and their interactions with different plant species, including the phytotoxicity, uptakes, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials by the plant at the whole plant and cellular level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.