Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25202636›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2014

cpDNA microsatellite markers for Lemna minor (Araceae): Phylogeographic implications.

Gowher A Wani, Manzoor A Shah, Zafar A Reshi, Alain R Atangana, Damase P Khasa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gowher A WaniDepartment of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190 006, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Manzoor A ShahDepartment of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190 006, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Zafar A ReshiDepartment of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190 006, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Alain R AtanganaCentre for Forest Research and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec GIV0A6, Canada.
Damase P KhasaCentre for Forest Research and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec GIV0A6, Canada.
University of Kashmir · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPREMISE OF THE STUDY: A lack of genetic markers impedes our understanding of the population biology of Lemna minor. Thus, the development of appropriate genetic markers for L. minor promises to be highly useful for population genetic studies and for addressing other life history questions regarding the species. • METHODS AND

resultsFor the first time, we characterized nine polymorphic and 24 monomorphic chloroplast microsatellite markers in L. minor using DNA samples of 26 individuals sampled from five populations in Kashmir and of 17 individuals from three populations in Quebec. Initially, we designed 33 primer pairs, which were tested on genomic DNA from natural populations. Nine loci provided markers with two alleles. Based on genotyping of the chloroplast DNA fragments from 43 sampled individuals, we identified one haplotype in Quebec and 11 haplotypes in Kashmir, of which one occurs in 56% of the genotypes, one in 8%, and nine in 4%, respectively. There was a maximum of two alleles per locus. •

conclusionsThese new chloroplast microsatellite markers for L. minor and haplotype distribution patterns indicate a complex phylogeographic history that merits further investigation.

Indexed as

Araceaechloroplast DNAhaplotypeLemna minormicrosatellites

Identifiers

PMID25202636
PMCPMC4103473
OpenAlexW2038463564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.