Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25202392›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2014

Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: Immunophenotype and differentiation.

Xue Wen, Weiqiang Wu, Bo Wang, Hongtian Yao, Xiaodong Teng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xue WenDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Weiqiang WuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Bo WangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Hongtian YaoDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Xiaodong TengDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) of the ampulla of Vater is extremely rare and the histogenesis remains unknown. In the present study, to investigate the immunohistochemical phenotypes, discuss the histological origin and evaluate the correlation between the immunohistochemical phenotypes and survival of ampullary SRC patients, a retrospective review was conducted. This included all ampullary carcinoma patients treated at The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, and was performed over a five-year period between 2008 and 2012. Eight resected ampullary SRC specimens were examined histopathologically and immunohistochemically, using cytokeratin (CK) and mucin (MUC) immunohistochemical phenotypes. Of all 162 patients with ampullary lesions, eight cases (4.9%) of ampullary SRC were identified. Immunohistochemical analyses of the eight cases revealed the positive expression of CK7 in five, CK19 in seven, CK20 in one, MUC1 in five, MUC2 in three, caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 in one, MUC5AC in seven and MUC6 in four of the eight cases, while loss of E-cadherin and β-catenin was observed in four of the eight cases. According to immunohistochemical classification, ampullary SRC can be classified into four subtypes: Intestinal (I), pancreatobiliary (PB), gastric and mixed types (composed of I mucosa lining and PB epithelium). Patients with the I-type ampullary SRC demonstrated a more favorable prognosis than that of patients with the PB-type ampullary SRC. Additionally, patients with ampullary SRC of I or PB type with gastric differentiation may have a worse prognosis than others. The coexpression of the E-cadherin/β-catenin complex may also indicate poor prognosis in PB-type ampullary SRC. In conclusion, the clinical five-year follow-up of the patients with pure SRC was more positive than that of those with I-, PB-, gastric- or mixed-type ampullary SRC. The coexpression of the E-cadherin/β-catenin complex may present a poor prognosis in the PB type of ampullary SRC.

Indexed as

ampulla of Vaterdifferentiationimmunophenotypesignet ring cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID25202392
PMCPMC4156204
OpenAlexW2073371912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.