Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25202153›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association2014

The diagnostic accuracy of the Kemp's test: a systematic review.

Kent Stuber, Caterina Lerede, Kevyn Kristmanson, Sandy Sajko, Paul Bruno

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 1-A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Lumbar Facet Joint Disease: What, Why, and When?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Examination of Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spine Guide for Neurosurgery Residents.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Medial Branch Blocks for Diagnosis of Facet Joint Pain Etiology and Use in Chronic Pain Litigation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kent StuberDivision of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.
Caterina LeredePrivate practice, Calgary, Alberta.
Kevyn KristmansonPrivate practice, Swift Current, Saskatchewan.
Sandy SajkoPrivate practice, Oakville, Ontario.
Paul BrunoAssistant Professor and CCRF Research Chair in Neuromusculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina.
Calgary Laboratory Services · CACanadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health · AUMillar College of the Bible · CAOakville Public Library · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this review was to evaluate the existing literature regarding the accuracy of the Kemp's test in the diagnosis of facet joint pain compared to a reference standard.

methodsSeveral databases were searched. All diagnostic accuracy studies comparing the Kemp's test with an acceptable reference standard were included. Included studies were scored for quality and internal validity.

resultsFive articles met the inclusion criteria of this review. Two studies had a low risk of bias, and three had a low concern regarding applicability. Pooling of data from studies using similar methods revealed that the test's negative predictive value was the only diagnostic accuracy measure above 50% (56.8%, 59.9%).

conclusionsCurrently, the literature supporting the use of the Kemp's test is limited and indicates that it has poor diagnostic accuracy. It is debatable whether clinicians should continue to use this test to diagnose facet joint pain.

Indexed as

chiropracticdiagnosisfacetjointKemp testpain

Identifiers

PMID25202153
PMCPMC4139762
OpenAlexW2318579244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.