Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25201956›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Evolution of ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Natalia L Komarova, Jan A Burger, Dominik Wodarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Aspirin and the chemoprevention of cancers: A mathematical and evolutionary dynamics perspective.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia L KomarovaDepartment of Mathematics and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; and komarova@uci.edu.
Jan A BurgerDepartment of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230.
Dominik WodarzDepartment of Mathematics and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; and.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib is a new targeted therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib is given orally on a continuous schedule and induces durable remissions in the majority of CLL patients. However, a small proportion of patients initially responds to the BTKi and then develops resistance. Estimating the frequency, timing, and individual risk of developing resistance to ibrutinib, therefore, would be valuable for long-term management of patients. Computational evolutionary models, based on measured kinetic parameters of patients, allow us to approach these questions and to develop a roadmap for personalized prognosis and treatment management. Our kinetic models predict that BTKi-resistant mutants exist before initiation of ibrutinib therapy, although they only comprise a minority of the overall tumor burden. Furthermore, we can estimate the time required for resistant cells to grow to detectable levels. We predict that this can be highly variable, depending mostly on growth and death rates of the individual CLL cell clone. For a specific patient, this time can be predicted with a high degree of certainty. Our model can thus be used to predict for how long ibrutinib can suppress the disease in individual patients. Furthermore, the model can suggest whether prior debulking of the tumor with chemo-immunotherapy can prolong progression-free survival under ibrutinib. Finally, by applying the models to data that document progression during ibrutinib therapy, we estimated that resistant mutants might have a small (<2%) mean fitness advantage in the absence of treatment, compared with sensitive cells.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmEvolution, MolecularLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellModels, BiologicalMutationNeoplasm ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesAdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseHumansPiperidinesPrognosisPyrazolesPyrimidinesAdenineAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseibrutinibNeoplasm ProteinsPiperidinesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrazolesPyrimidinesdrug resistanceevolutionary dynamicsmathematical modelspersonalized medicinestochastic dynamics

Identifiers

PMID25201956
PMCPMC4183279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.