Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25201929›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Comparing chronic pain treatment seekers in primary care versus tertiary care settings.

Erin L Fink-Miller, Dustin M Long, Richard T Gross

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Primary care for opioid use disorder.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L Fink-MillerFrom the Department of Psychology, Penn State Harrisburg, Middletown, PA (ELF-M); and the Department of Biostatistics (DML) and Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry (RTG), West Virginia University Medical Center, Morgantown. elf17@psu.edu.
Dustin M LongFrom the Department of Psychology, Penn State Harrisburg, Middletown, PA (ELF-M); and the Department of Biostatistics (DML) and Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry (RTG), West Virginia University Medical Center, Morgantown.
Richard T GrossFrom the Department of Psychology, Penn State Harrisburg, Middletown, PA (ELF-M); and the Department of Biostatistics (DML) and Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry (RTG), West Virginia University Medical Center, Morgantown.
Pennsylvania State University · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients frequently seek treatment for chronic nonmalignant pain in primary care settings. Compared with physicians who have completed extensive specialization (eg, fellowships) in pain management, primary care physicians receive much less formal training in managing chronic pain. While chronic pain represents a complicated condition in its own right, the recent increase in opioid prescriptions further muddles treatment. It is unknown whether patients with chronic pain seeking treatment in primary care differ from those seeking treatment in tertiary care settings. This study sought to determine whether patients with chronic pain in primary care reported less pain, fewer psychological variables related to pain, and lower risk of medication misuse/abuse compared with those in tertiary care.

methodsData collected from patients with chronic pain in primary care settings and tertiary care settings were analyzed for significant differences using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Fisher exact tests, and linear regression. A host of variables among populations, including demographics, self-reported pain severity, psychological variables related to pain, and risk for opioid misuse and abuse, were compared.

resultsFindings suggest that primary care patients with chronic pain were similar to those in tertiary care on a host of indices and reported more severe pain. There were no significant group differences for risk of medication misuse or abuse.

conclusionIt seems that primary care physicians care for a complicated group of patients with chronic pain that rivals the complexity of those seen in specialized tertiary care pain management facilities.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareRisk AssessmentTertiary Health CareWest VirginiaYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainOpioidsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25201929
PMCPMC4410385
OpenAlexW2146965162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.