Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25201620›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2014

Stress urinary incontinence and LUTS in women--effects on sexual function.

Brigitte Fatton, Renaud de Tayrac, Pierre Costa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. [Pelvic floor reconstruction and sexual function].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function.Nature reviews. Urology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Urinary incontinence in women.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  15. Female urinary incontinence and sexuality.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brigitte FattonUrogynecology Unit, Gynecology Department, University Hospital of Nîmes, CHU Caremeau, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029 Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Renaud de TayracUrogynecology Unit, Gynecology Department, University Hospital of Nîmes, CHU Caremeau, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029 Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Pierre CostaUrology Department, University Hospital of Nîmes, CHU Caremeau, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, 30029 Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sexual impact of urinary incontinence in women depends on a host of parameters, including physical, psychological, social and cultural dimensions. Evaluation of the effects of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and lower urinary tract symptoms on sexual function is often biased by their common association with other pelvic floor disorders, such as pelvic organ prolapse, which also affect sexual satisfaction. Indeed, these complexities are reflected in the literature, which shows considerable disparity in sexual functional characteristics in women with incontinence both before and after treatment. This discordance is further emphasized by heterogeneity in study design, quality and analysis. Here, we describe the nature of sexual dysfunction in women with incontinence, including coital incontinence. The various treatments for SUI, which include transvaginal tape surgeries, can also affect sexual function, positively or negatively. Coital incontinence seems to be a good predictor of an improvement in postoperative sexual parameters: its cure, achieved by >90% of women, to a large extent explains the sexual benefits reported in several studies. By contrast, deterioration in sexual function is sometimes reported after surgery, with de novo or worsened dyspareunia being the most common cause. The literature does not contain any convincing arguments for one treatment or another on the basis of sexual functional outcome.

Indexed as

DyspareuniaFemaleHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsPelvic Organ ProlapseSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID25201620
OpenAlexW2020081008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.