Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25201050›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2014

HER2-positive endometrial cancer subtype carries poor prognosis.

Sylwia Lapińska-Szumczyk, Anna Supernat, Hanna Majewska, Jacek Gulczyński, Agata Luczak, Wojciech Biernat, Dariusz Wydra, Anna J Zaczek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Significance ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Article
  3. Detection of ERBB2 amplification in uterine serous carcinoma by next-generation sequencing: an approach highly concordant with standard assays.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review.Journal of cancer research & therapy · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immunohistochemical characterisation of molecular subtypes in endometrial cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylwia Lapińska-SzumczykDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna Supernat
Hanna Majewska
Jacek Gulczyński
Agata Luczak
Wojciech Biernat
Dariusz Wydra
Anna J Zaczek
Gdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a hormone-dependent, most frequent malignancy of the female genital tract, yet no molecular subtype classification based receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) has been established so far. Assuming that molecular subtypes might differ fundamentally in EC, we analyzed expression levels of ER, PR, and HER2 with immunohistochemistry and aimed to determine clinical significance of four molecular subtypes: ER+/PR+/HER2+; ER+/PR+/HER2-, ER-/PR-/HER2+, and ER-/PR-/HER2-. The study included 400 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor EC samples which covered all stages of endometrial carcinoma, from IA to IVB. ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtype correlated with the poorest outcome, ER+/PR+/HER2- subtype was associated with the most favorable prognosis (p = 0.002). Molecular subtype division remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis, accompanying parameters such as diabetes, hypertension, stage, myometrial infiltration, and metastases, all of which yielded hazard ratios between 1.39 and 2.23. ER+/PR+/HER2+ and ER+/PR+/HER2- subtypes had low average TP53 and TOP2A expression levels when compared with ER-/PR-/HER2+ and ER-/PR-/HER2- (both p < 0.00001). Molecular subtypes in EC do show diversity in terms of prognosis, clinicopathological, and molecular characteristics. ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtype exhibit is exceptionally aggressive tumor characteristics. Subtype differentiation might aid prediction of treatment response in EC.

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, NeoplasmChi-Square DistributionDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEndometrial NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAntigens, NeoplasmDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTOP2A protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53endometrial cancerestrogen receptorHER2 receptormolecular subtypesprogesterone receptor

Identifiers

PMID25201050
PMCPMC5350924
OpenAlexW1492415140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.