ArticleGenome biology2014
Checkpoints couple transcription network oscillator dynamics to cell-cycle progression.
Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of the Cell-Cycle Clock Models: Biochemical or Transcriptional?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- A yeast cell cycle pulse generator model shows consistency with multiple oscillatory and checkpoint mutant datasets.Mathematical biosciences · 2024Article
- Experimental guidance for discovering genetic networks through hypothesis reduction on time series.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Conservation of dynamic characteristics of transcriptional regulatory elements in periodic biological processes.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Using extremal events to characterize noisy time series.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020Article
- The cell-cycle transcriptional network generates and transmits a pulse of transcription once each cell cycle.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2019Article
- Better together: Unifying discordant cell-cycle oscillator models.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- Reconciling conflicting models for global control of cell-cycle transcription.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2017Article
- Connecting virulence pathways to cell-cycle progression in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans.Current genetics · 2017Review
- Targeted inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 by a novel small-molecule inhibitor induces mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis in human bladder cancer cells.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017Article
- Investigating Conservation of the Cell-Cycle-Regulated Transcriptional Program in the Fungal Pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Cdk1 activity acts as a quantitative platform for coordinating cell cycle progression with periodic transcription.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe coupling of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) to an intrinsically oscillating network of transcription factors has been proposed to control progression through the cell cycle in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The transcription network regulates the temporal expression of many genes, including cyclins, and drives cell-cycle progression, in part, by generating successive waves of distinct CDK activities that trigger the ordered program of cell-cycle events. Network oscillations continue autonomously in mutant cells arrested by depletion of CDK activities, suggesting the oscillator can be uncoupled from cell-cycle progression. It is not clear what mechanisms, if any, ensure that the network oscillator is restrained when progression in normal cells is delayed or arrested. A recent proposal suggests CDK acts as a master regulator of cell-cycle processes that have the potential for autonomous oscillatory behavior.
resultsHere we find that mitotic CDK is not sufficient for fully inhibiting transcript oscillations in arrested cells. We do find that activation of the DNA replication and spindle assembly checkpoints can fully arrest the network oscillator via overlapping but distinct mechanisms. Further, we demonstrate that the DNA replication checkpoint effector protein, Rad53, acts to arrest a portion of transcript oscillations in addition to its role in halting cell-cycle progression.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that checkpoint mechanisms, likely via phosphorylation of network transcription factors, maintain coupling of the network oscillator to progression during cell-cycle arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.