Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25200947›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

Checkpoints couple transcription network oscillator dynamics to cell-cycle progression.

Sara L Bristow, Adam R Leman, Laura A Simmons Kovacs, Anastasia Deckard, John Harer, Steven B Haase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of the Cell-Cycle Clock Models: Biochemical or Transcriptional?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using extremal events to characterize noisy time series.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara L Bristow
Adam R Leman
Laura A Simmons Kovacs
Anastasia Deckard
John Harer
Steven B Haase
Duke University · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Project 6P50GM081883 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENFEY, PHILIP N · 2007 to 2012
$14.9M
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Training ProgramT32GM071340 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAGWENE, PAUL MITAARI · 2005 to 2020
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081883NIGMS NIH HHS P50-GM081883NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coupling of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) to an intrinsically oscillating network of transcription factors has been proposed to control progression through the cell cycle in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The transcription network regulates the temporal expression of many genes, including cyclins, and drives cell-cycle progression, in part, by generating successive waves of distinct CDK activities that trigger the ordered program of cell-cycle events. Network oscillations continue autonomously in mutant cells arrested by depletion of CDK activities, suggesting the oscillator can be uncoupled from cell-cycle progression. It is not clear what mechanisms, if any, ensure that the network oscillator is restrained when progression in normal cells is delayed or arrested. A recent proposal suggests CDK acts as a master regulator of cell-cycle processes that have the potential for autonomous oscillatory behavior.

resultsHere we find that mitotic CDK is not sufficient for fully inhibiting transcript oscillations in arrested cells. We do find that activation of the DNA replication and spindle assembly checkpoints can fully arrest the network oscillator via overlapping but distinct mechanisms. Further, we demonstrate that the DNA replication checkpoint effector protein, Rad53, acts to arrest a portion of transcript oscillations in addition to its role in halting cell-cycle progression.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that checkpoint mechanisms, likely via phosphorylation of network transcription factors, maintain coupling of the network oscillator to progression during cell-cycle arrest.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Cyclin BDNA ReplicationM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2CLB2 protein, S cerevisiaeCyclin BRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25200947
PMCPMC4180952
OpenAlexW2146146869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.