Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25200733›Full record

ReviewSeminars in fetal & neonatal medicine2014

Ethical language and decision-making for prenatally diagnosed lethal malformations.

Dominic Wilkinson, Lachlan de Crespigny, Vicki Xafis

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Supporting parents' emotional and mental health in the antenatal consultation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prenatal counseling and parental decision-making following a fetal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Medical and ethical challenges in the case of a prenatally undiagnosed massive congenital brain tumor.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominic WilkinsonOxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Robinson Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: dominic.wilkinson@philosophy.ox.ac.uk.
Lachlan de CrespignyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Blairgowrie, Victoria, Australia.
Vicki XafisRobinson Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUWellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 086041Wellcome Trust 086041/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical practice, and in the medical literature, severe congenital malformations such as trisomy 18, anencephaly, and renal agenesis are frequently referred to as 'lethal' or as 'incompatible with life'. However, there is no agreement about a definition of lethal malformations, nor which conditions should be included in this category. Review of outcomes for malformations commonly designated 'lethal' reveals that prolonged survival is possible, even if rare. This article analyses the concept of lethal malformations and compares it to the problematic concept of 'futility'. We recommend avoiding the term 'lethal' and suggest that counseling should focus on salient prognostic features instead. For conditions with a high chance of early death or profound impairment in survivors despite treatment, perinatal and neonatal palliative care would be ethical. However, active obstetric and neonatal management, if desired, may also sometimes be appropriate.

Indexed as

LanguageAbnormalities, MultipleCounselingDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrognosisEthicsFatal outcomeFetal terminationInfantMedical futilityNewbornTrisomy

Identifiers

PMID25200733
PMCPMC4339700
OpenAlexW2140257425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.