Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25200444›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2014

An improved syngeneic orthotopic murine model of human breast cancer progression.

Omar M Rashid, Masayuki Nagahashi, Suburamaniam Ramachandran, Catherine Dumur, Julia Schaum, Akimitsu Yamada, Krista P Terracina, Sheldon Milstien, Sarah Spiegel, Kazuaki Takabe

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PEGScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. iPSC-Derived Hereditary Breast Cancer Model Reveals theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omar M RashidDivision of Surgical Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, West Hospital 7-402, 1200 East Broad Street, PO Box 980011, Richmond, VA, 23298-0011, USA.
Masayuki Nagahashi
Suburamaniam Ramachandran
Catherine Dumur
Julia Schaum
Akimitsu Yamada
Krista P Terracina
Sheldon Milstien
Sarah Spiegel
Kazuaki Takabe
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Sphingosine Kinases in Cancer Cell SignalingR01CA061774 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGEL, SARAH · 1994 to 2015
$3.8M
Sphingosine-1 Phosphate in Breast Cancer Progression and LymphangiogenesisR01CA160688 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI TAKABE, KAZUAKI · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA061774NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160688NCI NIH HHS R01CA160688NCI NIH HHS R01CA61774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer drug development costs nearly $610 million and 37 months in preclinical mouse model trials with minimal success rates. Despite these inefficiencies, there are still no consensus breast cancer preclinical models. Murine mammary adenocarcinoma 4T1-luc2 cells were implanted subcutaneous (SQ) or orthotopically percutaneous (OP) injection in the area of the nipple, or surgically into the chest 2nd mammary fat pad under direct vision (ODV) in Balb/c immunocompetent mice. Tumor progression was followed by in vivo bioluminescence and direct measurements, pathology and survival determined, and tumor gene expression analyzed by genome-wide microarrays. ODV produced less variable-sized tumors and was a reliable method of implantation. ODV implantation into the chest 2nd mammary pad rather than into the abdominal 4th mammary pad, the most common implantation site, better mimicked human breast cancer progression pattern, which correlated with bioluminescent tumor burden and survival. Compared to SQ, ODV produced tumors that differentially expressed genes whose interaction networks are of importance in cancer research. qPCR validation of 10 specific target genes of interest in ongoing clinical trials demonstrated significant differences in expression. ODV implantation into the chest 2nd mammary pad provides the most reliable model that mimics human breast cancer compared from subcutaneous implantation that produces tumors with different genome expression profiles of clinical significance. Increased understanding of the limitations of the different preclinical models in use will help guide new investigations and may improve the efficiency of breast cancer drug development .

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell TransplantationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLuminescent MeasurementsMammary Glands, AnimalMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLTransplantation, HeterologousTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID25200444
PMCPMC4176514
OpenAlexW2020793525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.