Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25200251›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2014

Membrane related dynamics and the formation of actin in cells growing on micro-topographies: a spatial computational model.

Arne T Bittig, Claudia Matschegewski, J Barbara Nebe, Susanne Stählke, Adelinde M Uhrmacher

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arne T BittigModeling and Simulation Group, Institute of Computer Science, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 22, Rostock, 18059, Germany. arne.bittig@uni-rostock.de.
Claudia MatschegewskiDepartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Rostock, Schillingallee 69Rostock, 18057, Germany. claudia.matschegewski@uni-rostock.de.
J Barbara NebeDepartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Rostock, Schillingallee 69Rostock, 18057, Germany. barbara.nebe@med.uni-rostock.de.
Susanne StählkeDepartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Rostock, Schillingallee 69Rostock, 18057, Germany. susanne.staehlke@uni-rostock.de.
Adelinde M UhrmacherModeling and Simulation Group, Institute of Computer Science, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 22, Rostock, 18059, Germany. lin@informatik.uni-rostock.de.
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-cellular processes of cells at the interface to an implant surface are influenced significantly by their extra-cellular surrounding. Specifically, when growing osteoblasts on titanium surfaces with regular micro-ranged geometry, filaments are shorter, less aligned and they concentrate at the top of the geometric structures. Changes to the cytoskeleton network, i. e., its localization, alignment, orientation, and lengths of the filaments, as well as the overall concentration and distribution of key-actors are induced. For example, integrin is distributed homogeneously, whereas integrin in activated state and vinculin, both components of focal adhesions, have been found clustered on the micro-ranged geometries. Also, the concentration of Rho, an intracellular signaling protein related to focal adhesion regulation, was significantly lower.

resultsTo explore whether regulations associated with the focal adhesion complex can be responsible for the changed actin filament patterns, a spatial computational model has been developed using ML-Space, a rule-based model description language, and its associated Brownian-motion-based simulator. The focus has been on the deactivation of cofilin in the vicinity of the focal adhesion complex. The results underline the importance of sensing mechanisms to support a clustering of actin filament nucleations on the micro-ranged geometries, and of intracellular diffusion processes, which lead to spatially heterogeneous distributions of active (dephosphorylated) cofilin, which in turn influences the organization of the actin network. We find, for example, that the spatial heterogeneity of key molecular actors can explain the difference in filament lengths in cells on different micro-geometries partly, but to explain the full extent, further model assumptions need to be added and experimentally validated. In particular, our findings and hypothesis referring to the role, distribution, and amount of active cofilin have still to be verified in wet-lab experiments.

conclusionLetting cells grow on surface structures is a possibility to shed new light on the intricate mechanisms that relate membrane and actin related dynamics in the cell. Our results demonstrate the need for declarative expressive spatial modeling approaches that allow probing different hypotheses, and the central role of the focal adhesion complex not only for nucleating actin filaments, but also for regulating possible severing agents locally.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalActinsCell LineCell MembraneComputational BiologyCytoskeletonHumansIntegrinsOsteoblastsSpatial AnalysisTitaniumActinsIntegrinsTitanium

Identifiers

PMID25200251
PMCPMC4363941
OpenAlexW2142703690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.