ArticleExperimental brain research2014
Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging tasks associated with pseudoneglect.Experimental brain research · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rarely noticed in daily life, attention may prefer the left side of space. Such attentional biases offer key insights into functions of spatial attention and visual awareness because they complement pathological biases in patients with spatial neglect who become largely unaware of the left side after right-brain damage. Yet there is little comprehensive understanding of these normal and pathological biases and how they relate to other attentional functions. Here we used a grating-scales task (GST) to test whether leftward biases and their spatial frequency-dependent crossover interact with attentional mechanisms of distractor removal. We asked healthy participants to make perceptual judgements to capture attentional biases in a high and a low spatial frequency condition (GST-HI and GST-LO), and we degraded stimuli with distracting pixel noise. We found that with noise, crossover grew, while biases remained positively correlated. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we probed the feasibility of three models and conclude that our data can only be explained by two, or more, biasing mechanisms, arguably interacting with each other through interhemispheric competition. Our study sets the stage for a new systematic approach to investigating the visuospatial mechanisms of the right hemisphere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.