Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25200174›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2014

Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Jiaqing Chen, Matthias Niemeier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaqing ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto at Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, M1C 1A4, ON, Canada, jiaqing.chen@mail.utoronto.ca.
Matthias Niemeier
University of Toronto · CAYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rarely noticed in daily life, attention may prefer the left side of space. Such attentional biases offer key insights into functions of spatial attention and visual awareness because they complement pathological biases in patients with spatial neglect who become largely unaware of the left side after right-brain damage. Yet there is little comprehensive understanding of these normal and pathological biases and how they relate to other attentional functions. Here we used a grating-scales task (GST) to test whether leftward biases and their spatial frequency-dependent crossover interact with attentional mechanisms of distractor removal. We asked healthy participants to make perceptual judgements to capture attentional biases in a high and a low spatial frequency condition (GST-HI and GST-LO), and we degraded stimuli with distracting pixel noise. We found that with noise, crossover grew, while biases remained positively correlated. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we probed the feasibility of three models and conclude that our data can only be explained by two, or more, biasing mechanisms, arguably interacting with each other through interhemispheric competition. Our study sets the stage for a new systematic approach to investigating the visuospatial mechanisms of the right hemisphere.

Indexed as

AttentionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansJudgmentMaleMonte Carlo MethodPerceptual DisordersReaction TimeSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25200174
OpenAlexW2166670422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.