Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25199945›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2014

A review of standardized metabolic phenotyping of animal models.

Jan Rozman, Martin Klingenspor, Martin Hrabě de Angelis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Infection-elicited microbiota promotes host adaptation to nutrient restriction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Modulating the Metabolic Phenotype of Cancer Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan RozmanGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany, jan.rozman@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Martin Klingenspor
Martin Hrabě de Angelis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic phenotyping of genetically modified animals aims to detect new candidate genes and related metabolic pathways that result in dysfunctional energy balance regulation and predispose for diseases such as obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview on the technologies available to monitor energy flux (food uptake, bomb calorimetry of feces and food, and indirect calorimetry) and body composition (qNMR, DXA, and MRI) in animal models for human diseases with a special focus on phenotyping methods established in genetically engineered mice. We use an energy flux model to illustrate the principles of energy allocation, describe methodological aspects how to monitor energy balance, and introduce strategies for data analysis and presentation.

Indexed as

Body CompositionDisease Models, AnimalEnergy MetabolismPhenotypeAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCalorimetry, IndirectDigestionEatingGastrointestinal AbsorptionHumansVertebrates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.