Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25199629›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Impact of sepsis on risk of postoperative arterial and venous thromboses: large prospective cohort study.

Jacques D Donzé, Paul M Ridker, Samuel R G Finlayson, David W Bates

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of antiplatelet agents onFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacques D DonzéDivision of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 02120 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, 02115 Boston, Massachusetts, USA donze.author@gmail.com.
Paul M RidkerHarvard Medical School, 02115 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 02215 Boston, MA Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 02215 Boston, MA, USA.
Samuel R G FinlaysonDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, 84132 Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
David W BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 02120 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, 02115 Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of preoperative sepsis on risk of postoperative arterial and venous thromboses.

designProspective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS-NSQIP).

settingInpatient and outpatient procedures in 374 hospitals of all types across the United States, 2005-12.

participants2,305,380 adults who underwent surgical procedures.

main outcome measuresArterial thrombosis (myocardial infarction or stroke) and venous thrombosis (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) in the 30 days after surgery.

resultsAmong all surgical procedures, patients with preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome or any sepsis had three times the odds of having an arterial or venous postoperative thrombosis (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 3.0 to 3.1). The adjusted odds ratios were 2.7 (2.5 to 2.8) for arterial thrombosis and 3.3 (3.2 to 3.4) for venous thrombosis. The adjusted odds ratios for thrombosis were 2.5 (2.4 to 2.6) in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, 3.3 (3.1 to 3.4) in patients with sepsis, and 5.7 (5.4 to 6.1) in patients with severe sepsis, compared with patients without any systemic inflammation. In patients with preoperative sepsis, both emergency and elective surgical procedures had a twofold increased odds of thrombosis.

conclusionsPreoperative sepsis represents an important independent risk factor for both arterial and venous thromboses. The risk of thrombosis increases with the severity of the inflammatory response and is higher in both emergent and elective surgical procedures. Suspicion of thrombosis should be higher in patients with sepsis who undergo surgery.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesPulmonary EmbolismRisk AssessmentSepsisStroke

Identifiers

PMID25199629
PMCPMC4157562
OpenAlexW2171304780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.