Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25199574›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2014

Goal-directed treatment of osteoporosis in Europe.

J A Kanis, E McCloskey, J Branco, M-L Brandi, E Dennison, J-P Devogelaer, S Ferrari, J-M Kaufman, S Papapoulos, J-Y Reginster and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  3. Non-metastatic breast cancer patients discontinuing aromatase inhibitor on denosumab: what next?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Longitudinal Changes of Circulating miRNAs During Bisphosphonate and Teriparatide Treatment in an Animal Model of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Article
  9. Operationalizing Treat-to-Target for Osteoporosis.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  10. Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  11. Is a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis applicable in clinical practice? Consensus among a panel of European experts.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  12. Treat-to-target-mainstream or marketing?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Spanish consensus on treat to target for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  20. Bone Turnover Status: Classification Model and Clinical Implications.International journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

J A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK, w.j.pontefract@sheffield.ac.uk.
E McCloskey
J Branco
M-L Brandi
E Dennison
J-P Devogelaer
S Ferrari
J-M Kaufman
S Papapoulos
J-Y Reginster
R Rizzoli
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Sheffield · GBGhent University Hospital · BELeiden University Medical Center · NLUCLouvain · BEUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDespite the proven predictive ability of bone mineral density, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®), bone turnover markers, and fracture for osteoporotic fracture, their use as targets for treatment of osteoporosis is limited.

introductionTreat-to-target is a strategy applied in several fields of medicine and has recently become an area of interest in the management of osteoporosis. Its role in this setting remains controversial. This article was prepared following a European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group meeting convened under the auspices of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) to discuss the feasibility of applying such a strategy in osteoporosis in Europe.

methodsPotential targets range from the absence of an incident fracture to fixed levels of bone mineral density (BMD), a desired FRAX® score, a specified level of bone turnover markers or indeed changes in any one or a combination of these parameters.

resultsDespite the proven predictive ability of all of these variables for fracture (particularly BMD and FRAX), their use as targets remains limited due to low sensitivity, the influence of confounders and current lack of evidence that targets can be consistently reached.

conclusionESCEO considers that it is not currently feasible to apply a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis, though it did identify a need to continue to improve the targeting of treatment to those at higher risk (target-to-treat strategy) and a number of issues for the research agenda. These include international consensus on intervention thresholds and definition of treatment failure, further exploration of the relationship between fracture and BMD, and FRAX and treatment efficacy and investigation of the potential of short-term targets to improve adherence.

Indexed as

GoalsAbsorptiometry, PhotonBiomarkersBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDecision Support TechniquesDisease ManagementDrug MonitoringEuropeFeasibility StudiesHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesRisk AssessmentBiomarkersBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID25199574
OpenAlexW2075159686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.