Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25199531›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Evaluation of a standardized treatment regimen of anti-tuberculosis drugs for patients with multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Andrew J Nunn, I D Rusen, Armand Van Deun, Gabriela Torrea, Patrick P J Phillips, Chen-Yuan Chiang, S Bertel Squire, Jason Madan, Sarah K Meredith

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effectiveness of GenoType MTBDRThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew J NunnMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London WC2B 6NH, UK. andrew.nunn@ucl.ac.uk.
I D Rusen
Armand Van Deun
Gabriela Torrea
Patrick P J Phillips
Chen-Yuan Chiang
S Bertel Squire
Jason Madan
Sarah K Meredith

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U122888469Medical Research Council MR/J012513/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contrast to drug-sensitive tuberculosis, the guidelines for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) have a very poor evidence base; current recommendations, based on expert opinion, are that patients should be treated for a minimum of 20 months. A series of cohort studies conducted in Bangladesh identified a nine-month regimen with very promising results. There is a need to evaluate this regimen in comparison with the currently recommended regimen in a randomized controlled trial in a variety of settings, including patients with HIV-coinfection. METHODS/

designSTREAM is a multi-centre randomized trial of non-inferiority design comparing a nine-month regimen to the treatment currently recommended by the World Health Organization in patients with MDR pulmonary TB with no evidence on line probe assay of fluoroquinolone or kanamycin resistance. The nine-month regimen includes clofazimine and high-dose moxifloxacin and can be extended to 11 months in the event of delay in smear conversion. The primary outcome is based on the bacteriological status of the patients at 27 months post-randomization. Based on the assumption that the nine-month regimen will be slightly more effective than the control regimen and, given a 10% margin of non-inferiority, a total of 400 patients are required to be enrolled. Health economics data are being collected on all patients in selected sites. DISCUSSION: The results from the study in Bangladesh and cohorts in progress elsewhere are encouraging, but for this regimen to be recommended more widely than in a research setting, robust evidence is needed from a randomized clinical trial. Results from the STREAM trial together with data from ongoing cohorts should provide the evidence necessary to revise current recommendations for the treatment for MDR-TB.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with clincaltrials.gov (registration number: ISRCTN78372190) on 14 October 2010.

Indexed as

Research DesignAntitubercular AgentsBangladeshClinical ProtocolsClofazimineDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEthambutolFluoroquinolonesHumansIsoniazidKanamycinMoxifloxacinProthionamidePyrazinamideTime FactorsAntitubercular AgentsClofazimineEthambutolFluoroquinolonesIsoniazidKanamycinMoxifloxacinProthionamidePyrazinamide

Identifiers

PMID25199531
PMCPMC4164715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.