Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25197834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The knowledge translation status in selected Eastern-Mediterranean universities and research institutes.

Katayoun Maleki, Randah R Hamadeh, Jaleh Gholami, Ahmed Mandil, Saima Hamid, Zahid Ahmad Butt, Abdulaziz Bin Saeed, Dalia Y M El Kheir, Mohammed Saleem, Sahar Maqsoud and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katayoun MalekiKnowledge Utilization Research Center, TUMS, Tehran, Iran.
Randah R HamadehCollege of Medicine and Medical Sciences, AGU, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Jaleh GholamiKnowledge Utilization Research Center, TUMS, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmed MandilCollege of Medicine, KSU, Riyadh, KSA.
Saima HamidHealth Services Academy, MoH, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Zahid Ahmad ButtHealth Services Academy, MoH, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abdulaziz Bin SaeedDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, KSU, Riyadh, KSA.
Dalia Y M El KheirFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed SaleemHigh Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Sahar MaqsoudPreventive Affairs Department, Alexandria University Students' Clinic and Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
Najibullah SafiWHO Country Office, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Ban A Abdul-MajeedCollege of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Reza MajdzadehKnowledge Utilization Research Center, TUMS, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA serious worldwide effort to strengthen research based knowledge translation (KT) has begun in recent years and some countries, particularly developed ones, are trying to incorporate KT in their health and health research systems. Keeping in mind the recent economic depression and the need to perform more efficient research, we aimed to assess and compare the KT status of selected health research institutes in the Eastern Mediterranean Regions' countries, and to identify their strengths and weaknesses in the field.

methodsAfter finding the focal points that would steer the focus group discussions (FGDs) and help complete the 'Self Assessment Tool for Research Institutes' (SATORI) tool, each focal point held two FGDs in which researchers, research authorities and other individuals specified in detail further in the study were held. The scores obtained by each institute were evaluated quantitatively, and the transcriptions were analyzed qualitatively with OpenCode software.

resultsFor ease of analysis the 50 items of the SATORI were classified into 7 main domains: 'priority setting', 'research quality and timeliness', 'researchers' KT capacities', 'facilities and pre-requisites of KT', 'processes and regulations supporting KT', 'interaction with research users', and 'promoting and evaluating the use of knowledge'. Based on the scoring system, the strongest domain was 'research quality and timeliness'. 'Priority setting' was the weakest domain of all. The remaining domains were more or less equal in strength and were not in a favorable state. The qualitative findings confirmed the quantitative findings.

conclusionsThe main problem, it seems, is that a KT climate does not exist in the region. And despite the difference in the contexts, there are many similarities in the region's institutes included in this study. Collaborative efforts can play a role in creating this climate by steering countries towards KT and suggesting regional strategic directions according to their needs.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationUniversitiesHumansMediterranean Region

Identifiers

PMID25197834
PMCPMC4157749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.