Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25197624›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2014

Parasites as biological tags to assess host population structure: Guidelines, recent genetic advances and comments on a holistic approach.

Sarah R Catalano, Ian D Whittington, Stephen C Donnellan, Bronwyn M Gillanders

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Challenges for assessment of cohabiting stocks of argentine shortfin squidInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A singleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New Parasite Records for the SunfishFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PeerJ · 2017
    Article
  15. On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah R CatalanoMarine Parasitology Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Ian D WhittingtonMarine Parasitology Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Parasitology Section, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Stephen C DonnellanAustralian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Bronwyn M GillandersSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Environment Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
South Australian Museum · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the use of parasites as biological tags of marine fishes and cephalopods in host population structure studies. The majority of the work published has focused on marine fish and either single parasite species or more recently, whole parasite assemblages, as biological tags. There is representation of host organisms and parasites from a diverse range of taxonomic groups, although focus has primarily been on host species of commercial importance. In contrast, few studies have used parasites as tags to assess cephalopod population structure, even though records of parasites infecting cephalopods are well-documented. Squid species are the only cephalopod hosts for which parasites as biological tags have been applied, with anisakid nematode larvae and metacestodes being the parasite taxa most frequently used. Following a brief insight into the importance of accurate parasite identification, the population studies that have used parasites as biological tags for marine fishes and cephalopods are reviewed, including comments on the dicyemid mesozoans. The advancement of molecular genetic techniques is discussed in regards to the new ways parasite genetic data can be incorporated into population structure studies, alongside host population genetic analyses, followed by an update on the guidelines for selecting a parasite species as a reliable tag candidate. As multiple techniques and methods can be used to assess the population structure of marine organisms (e.g. artificial tags, phenotypic characters, biometrics, life history, genetics, otolith microchemistry and parasitological data), we conclude by commenting on a holistic approach to allow for a deeper insight into population structuring.

Indexed as

DicyemidaHost stock discriminationMarine parasitesMultidiscipline approachNext-generation sequencingTag guidelines

Identifiers

PMID25197624
PMCPMC4152261
OpenAlexW2063287891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.