Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25197549›Full record

ArticleJournal of nucleic acids investigation2013

Practical strategies for the evaluation of high-affinity protein/nucleic acid interactions.

Sarah E Altschuler, Karen A Lewis, Deborah S Wuttke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nucleic acids investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Macromolecular High-Affinity Binding Probed by Advanced Fluorescence Techniques.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of epitranscriptome reader proteins experimentally andComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Horizontal Agarose Gel Mobility Shift Assay for Protein-RNA Complexes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah E AltschulerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Karen A LewisDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Deborah S WuttkeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.

Funding

Predoctoral Training Molecular BiophysicsT32GM065103 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FALKE, JOSEPH J · 2002 to 2021
$4.3M
SINGLE STRANDED DNA RECOGNITION IN TELOMERESR01GM059414 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI WUTTKE, DEBORAH S. · 1999 to 2015
$3.7M
In Vitro Reconstitution and Biochemical Characterization of Yeast TelomeraseF32GM093528 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI LEWIS, KAREN ADELL · 2011 to 2012
$105k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM093528NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059414NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantitative evaluation of binding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids is highly sensitive to a variety of experimental conditions. Optimization of these conditions is critical for obtaining high quality, reproducible data, particularly in the context of very high affinity interactions. Here, we discuss the practical considerations involved in optimizing the apparent binding constant of an interaction as measured by two common quantitative assays, electrophoretic mobility shift assay and double-filter binding when measuring extremely tight protein/nucleic acid interactions with sub-nanomolar binding affinities. We include specific examples from two telomere end-binding protein systems,

Indexed as

EMSAfilter bindinghigh-affinitynucleic acidprotein

Identifiers

PMID25197549
PMCPMC4155600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.