Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25197367›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Low expression of RSK4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

Jun Cai, Hong Ma, Fang Huang, Dichao Zhu, Lei Zhao, Yudan Yang, Jianping Bi, Tao Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MiR-548d-3p Promotes Gastric Cancer by Targeting RSK4.Cancer management and research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun CaiCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China; ; Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University Jingzhou 443000, Hubei, P. R. China.
Hong MaCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Fang HuangCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Dichao ZhuCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Lei ZhaoCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Yudan YangCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Jianping BiCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Tao ZhangCancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430022, Hubei, P. R. China;
Union Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death all over the world. Ribosomal s6 kinase4 (RSK4), an X-linked gene, firstly was found as to be a potential tumor suppressive gene in a variety of cancers and is widely participated in signaling pathway. However its role in CRC is unclear. This study is to explore the correlation between the protein expression of RSK4 and clinical pathologic characteristics in colorectal tumors, which might serve as a prognostic determinant of colorectal cancers.

methodsBiopsies of 103 colorectal cancer and 46 matched adjacent noncancerous tissues were collected for analysis of RSK4 protein by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between RSK4 protein expression and the clinical pathological features of colorectal cancers were evaluated by Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between prognostic factors and patient survival was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsRSK4 was conversely correlated with some pathological classifications (P<0.05 for N, G and clinical staging), and there were no statistically significant differences in age, CEA expression in blood, CA199 and tumors t-staging (x(2) test, P>0.05 for all categories) respectively. Furthermore, patients with high protein level of RSK4 showed prolonged overall survivals (P<0.05). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that low expression level of RSK is an independent risk factor for high mortality in colorectal cancer.

conclusionsLow RSK4 expression is correlated with advanced clinical pathologic classifications and is a poor overall survival in colorectal cancer patients. These findings suggest that RSK4 may serve as a useful marker in prognostic evaluation for patients with colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRibosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 90-kDaBiomarkers, TumorRibosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 90-kDaRPS6KA6 protein, humanColorectal cancerimmunohistochemistryRSK4survival analysis

Identifiers

PMID25197367
PMCPMC4152057
OpenAlexW37089595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.