ArticleNMR in biomedicine2014
Automated whole-brain N-acetylaspartate proton MRS quantification.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Emerging Role of N-Acetylaspartate in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Global brain volume and N-acetyl-aspartate decline over seven decades of normal aging.Neurobiology of aging · 2021Article
- Whole brain neuronal abnormalities in focal epilepsy quantified with proton MR spectroscopy.Epilepsy research · 2018Article
- Global brain metabolic quantification with whole-head proton MRS at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Article
- Quantifying global-brain metabolite level changes with whole-head proton MR spectroscopy at 3T.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2017Article
- Whole-Brain N-Acetylaspartate Concentration Is Preserved during Mild Hypercapnia Challenge.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Concentration of the neuronal marker, N-acetylaspartate (NAA), a quantitative metric for the health and density of neurons, is currently obtained by integration of the manually defined peak in whole-head proton ((1) H)-MRS. Our goal was to develop a full spectral modeling approach for the automatic estimation of the whole-brain NAA concentration (WBNAA) and to compare the performance of this approach with a manual frequency-range peak integration approach previously employed. MRI and whole-head (1) H-MRS from 18 healthy young adults were examined. Non-localized, whole-head (1) H-MRS obtained at 3 T yielded the NAA peak area through both manually defined frequency-range integration and the new, full spectral simulation. The NAA peak area was converted into an absolute amount with phantom replacement and normalized for brain volume (segmented from T1 -weighted MRI) to yield WBNAA. A paired-sample t test was used to compare the means of the WBNAA paradigms and a likelihood ratio test used to compare their coefficients of variation. While the between-subject WBNAA means were nearly identical (12.8 ± 2.5 mm for integration, 12.8 ± 1.4 mm for spectral modeling), the latter's standard deviation was significantly smaller (by ~50%, p = 0.026). The within-subject variability was 11.7% (±1.3 mm) for integration versus 7.0% (±0.8 mm) for spectral modeling, i.e., a 40% improvement. The (quantifiable) quality of the modeling approach was high, as reflected by Cramer-Rao lower bounds below 0.1% and vanishingly small (experimental - fitted) residuals. Modeling of the whole-head (1) H-MRS increases WBNAA quantification reliability by reducing its variability, its susceptibility to operator bias and baseline roll, and by providing quality-control feedback. Together, these enhance the usefulness of the technique for monitoring the diffuse progression and treatment response of neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.