ArticleClinical and translational science2015
Understanding the supports of and challenges to community engagement in the CTSAs.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It's Important to Use Dialogue that Promotes a Safe Space of Inclusivity": Reflections From a Community Engagement Studio to Inform Creative Alcohol Research.Community health equity research & policy · 2026Article
- Community feedback sessions: An adaptation of the community engagement studio model to enhance scalability.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Institutional community engagement leader perspectives on supporting ethical community-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Approaches and tools to measure individual-level research experience, activities, and outcomes: A narrative review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Negligence in biomedical research: an anti-racist approach for substance use researchers.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Community scientist program provides bi-directional communication and co-learning between researchers and community members.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- The intersection of community engagement and team science research: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Building Community Engagement Capacity in a Transdisciplinary Population Health Research Consortium.Journal of community engagement and scholarship · 2024Article
- Opportunities to enhance consumer and community engagement training for researchers and healthcare providers: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Integrating community voices in the research continuum: Perspectives on a consultation service.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Community-academic partnerships to embrace and ensure diversity, equity, and inclusion in translational science: Evidence of successful community engagement.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- The community voices program to facilitate community-academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program's usefulness.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- The Stacked Community Engagement model: A practical model for developing community-engaged academic medical faculty.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Integrating special and underserved populations in translational research: Environmental scan of adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program hubs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Review
- Advancing health equity through CTSA programs: Opportunities for interaction between health equity, dissemination and implementation, and translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Dual-Track Research Training Program for Community Members and Community-Based Organizations.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2020Article
- Community stakeholder engagement during a vaccine demonstration project in Nigeria: lessons on implementation of the good participatory practice guidelines.The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
- "Our lab is the community": Defining essential supporting infrastructure in engagement research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Enhancing translational researchers' ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program has raised the profile and the available funding for engagement in biomedical research. Such increased funding and attention may address known barriers to engagement. However, little work has been done to describe experiences across multiple CTSAs, especially how the CTSA structure supports or challenges engagement.
objectiveWe sought to understand the supports and challenges experienced by multiple CTSAs as they pursued community engagement. This knowledge may help guide future efforts to support and enhance community engagement in biomedical research.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with CTSA community engagement core leaders and staff from the 2006 cohort of CTSAs (n = 12).
resultsA total of 17 interviews with respondents from nine institutions identified three support themes, including: funding, existing relationships with communities, and leadership and a partnership approach at the institution. Six challenge themes arose: need for capacity development, lack of positive relationships with communities, lack of leadership, funding constraints, time and staff constraints, and unsustainable models.
conclusionThe CTSAs have brought much-needed attention to community engagement in research, but more can be done to adequately support engagement. Challenges remain that need to be addressed to achieve the potential benefits of engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.