Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25196618›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2014

Brain radiation-related black dots on susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Daniel Varon, Michael Simons, Francisco Chiang, Gustavo Tedesqui, Gerardo Pacheco, Pablo Martinez, Mauricio Castillo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel VaronDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA - danielmvaron@hotmail.com.
Michael SimonsDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Francisco ChiangDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Gustavo TedesquiDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Gerardo PachecoDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Pablo MartinezDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mauricio CastilloDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Communities In Schools of Orange County · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small blood vessel injury is a feature of post irradiation brain. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is a technique that exploits the magnetic properties of tissues, such as blood and iron content and is thus sensitive to hemorrhage as a marker of small vessel injury. Our purpose was to assess post irradiation brain findings using SWI. We evaluated 12 patients with follow-up MRI studies who underwent cranial irradiation for primary or metastatic tumors. From their clinical records, the latency interval, type of radiation, and total dose were established. The number and the distribution of "black dots" on SWI were analyzed. We also compared the findings on SWI with those seen on other MRI sequences. In all patients, black dots were clearly identified on SWI, while on conventional MRI (T2 and FLAIR) none were visible. Two patients with glial tumors received radiation with fields conforming to tumor beds, while all other patients received whole brain irradiation or craniospinal radiation. The total radiation doses ranged from 45-54 Gy. Latency interval between the time of irradiation and time of detection of the black dots was four to 60 months (mean, 31 months). In ten patients diffuse black dots were observed and in two patients these were located in the irradiated field. Black dots occurred in the cerebrum, cerebellum, and choroid plexuses. None of these dots showed enhancement. Follow-up in four patients showed that the numbers of these black dots had increased. Black dots were not present before radiation in any patient. Radiation-related black dots are an effect of cranial irradiation and may be related to small vessel damage. SWI is a sensitive technique for evaluation of these black dots.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain NeoplasmsCerebrovascular TraumaChildCranial IrradiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesYoung Adultradiation, MRIsusceptibility-weighted imaging

Identifiers

PMID25196618
PMCPMC4236872
OpenAlexW2314839326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.