Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25196082›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2014

Effect-directed analysis of Elizabeth River porewater: developmental toxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Mingliang Fang, Gordon J Getzinger, Ellen M Cooper, Bryan W Clark, Lindsey V T Garner, Richard T Di Giulio, P Lee Ferguson, Heather M Stapleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An epigenetic memory at thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mingliang FangNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Gordon J Getzinger
Ellen M Cooper
Bryan W Clark
Lindsey V T Garner
Richard T Di Giulio
P Lee Ferguson
Heather M Stapleton
Duke University · US

Funding

Zebrafish as a Detector of Organophosphate ExposureP42ES010356 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD D LEVIN · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010356NIEHS NIH HHS P42ES010356-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, effect-directed analysis was used to identify teratogenic compounds in porewater collected from a Superfund site along the Elizabeth River estuary (VA, USA). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to the porewater displayed acute developmental toxicity and cardiac teratogenesis, presumably because of elevated sediment levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from historical creosote use. Pretreatment of porewater with several physical and chemical particle removal methods revealed that colloid-bound chemicals constituted the bulk of the observed toxicity. Size-exclusive chromatography and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography were used to fractionate Elizabeth River porewater. Acute toxicity of porewater extracts and extract fractions was assessed as the pericardial area in embryonic zebrafish. The most toxic fraction contained several known aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists (e.g., 1,2-benzofluorene and 1,2-benzanthracene) and cytochrome P450 A1 (CPY1A) inhibitors (e.g., dibenzothiophene and fluoranthene). The second most toxic fraction contained known AhR agonists (e.g., benzo[a]pyrene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene). Addition of a CYP1A inhibitor, fluoranthene, increased toxicity in all active porewater fractions, suggesting synergism between several contaminants present in porewaters. The results indicate that the observed acute toxicity associated with Elizabeth River porewater results from high concentrations of AhR agonistic PAHs and mixture effects related to interactions between compounds co-occurring at the Elizabeth River site. However, even after extensive fractionation and chemical characterization, it remains plausible that some active compounds in Elizabeth River porewater remain unidentified.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenz(a)AnthracenesBenzo(a)pyreneCardiovascular SystemChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1Embryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPyrenesReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonRiversVirginiaWater Pollutants, Chemicalbenz(a)anthraceneBenz(a)Anthracenesbenzo(a)fluoreneBenzo(a)pyreneCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1fluorantheneFluorenesindeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrenePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPyrenesReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonWater Pollutants, ChemicalEffect-directed analysisElizabeth RiverPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)PorewaterZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25196082
PMCPMC4393830
OpenAlexW2141596111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.