Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25195913›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2014

Molecular replacement with a large number of molecules in the asymmetric unit.

Chacko Jobichen, Kunchithapadam Swaminathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ten things I `hate' about refinement.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chacko JobichenDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Kunchithapadam SwaminathanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential increase in protein structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has resulted in the elucidation of most, if not all, protein folds, thus making molecular replacement (MR) the most frequently used method for structure determination. A survey of the PDB shows that most of the structures determined by molecular replacement contain less than ten molecules in the asymmetric unit and that it is predominantly virus and ribosome structures that contain more than 20 molecules in the asymmetric unit. While the success of the MR method depends on several factors, such as the homology and the size of an input model, it is also a well known fact that this method can become significantly difficult in cases with a large number of molecules in the asymmetric unit, higher crystallographic symmetry and tight packing. In this paper, five representative structures containing 16-18 homomeric molecules in the asymmetric unit and the strategies that have been used to solve these structures are described. The difficulties faced and the lessons learned from these structure-determination efforts will be useful for selected and similar future situations with a large number of molecules in the asymmetric unit.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein Conformationlarge number of molecules in the asymmetric unitmolecular replacementstrategies for structure determination

Identifiers

PMID25195913
PMCPMC4157440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.