ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015
Stakeholder prioritization of zoonoses in Japan with analytic hierarchy process method.
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A rapid review of best practices in the development of risk registers for public health emergency management.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- A Rapid Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods in the Context of One Health for All-Hazards Threat Prioritization.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Pooled it
- Women's Preferences in Early Pregnancy Loss Management: A Focus on Psychological Considerations Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.The patient · 2026Article
- How do patients with primary hypertension assess different endpoints of their treatment? a survey using analytic hierarchy process.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Transforming One Health in India: National Multisectoral Mixed Method Study on Prioritization of Zoonotic Diseases.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- A Generalizable Prioritization Protocol for Climate-Sensitive Zoonotic Diseases.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- The study on setting priorities of zoonotic agents for medical preparedness and allocation of research resources.PloS one · 2024Article
- Approaches for disease prioritization and decision-making in animal health, 2000-2021: a structured scoping review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Zoonotic pathogens and diseases detected in Vietnam, 2020-2021.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Prioritization of zoonotic diseases of public health significance in Nigeria using the one-health approach.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Identification and prioritization of strategies to tackle COVID-19 outbreak: A group-BWM based MCDM approach.Applied soft computing · 2021Article
- A Risk Analysis Framework for Prioritizing and Managing Biosecurity Threats.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2020Article
- Prioritising pathogens for the management of severe febrile patients to improve clinical care in low- and middle-income countries.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Multi-sectoral prioritization of zoonotic diseases: One health perspective from Ahmedabad, India.PloS one · 2019Article
- World Health Organization Methodology to Prioritize Emerging Infectious Diseases in Need of Research and Development.Emerging infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Criteria for the prioritization of public health interventions for climate-sensitive vector-borne diseases in Quebec.PloS one · 2017Article
- Multi-Stakeholder Decision Aid for Improved Prioritization of the Public Health Impact of Climate Sensitive Infectious Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Prioritization of Zoonotic Diseases in Kenya, 2015.PloS one · 2016Article
- Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There exists an urgent need to develop iterative risk assessment strategies of zoonotic diseases. The aim of this study is to develop a method of prioritizing 98 zoonoses derived from animal pathogens in Japan and to involve four major groups of stakeholders: researchers, physicians, public health officials, and citizens. We used a combination of risk profiling and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Profiling risk was accomplished with semi-quantitative analysis of existing public health data. AHP data collection was performed by administering questionnaires to the four stakeholder groups. Results showed that researchers and public health officials focused on case fatality as the chief important factor, while physicians and citizens placed more weight on diagnosis and prevention, respectively. Most of the six top-ranked diseases were similar among all stakeholders. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, severe acute respiratory syndrome, and Ebola fever were ranked first, second, and third, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.