Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25195590›Full record

Trial reportTargeted oncology2015

Weekly and every 2 weeks cetuximab maintenance therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: randomized non-comparative phase IIIb NEXT trial.

David F Heigener, José Rodrigues Pereira, Enriqueta Felip, Juraj Mazal, Lyudmila Manzyuk, Eng Huat Tan, Ofer Merimsky, Barbara Sarholz, Regina Esser, Ulrich Gatzemeier

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00820755 (Open, Randomized, Multinational Phase IIIb Trial Evaluating the Activity and Safety of Cetuximab as 250 mg/m^2 Weekly and 500 mg/m^2 Every Two Weeks Maintenance Therapy After Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Combination With Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Subjects With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00820755 phase3completednot on this map

Open, Randomized, Multinational Phase IIIb Trial Evaluating the Activity and Safety of Cetuximab as 250 mg/m^2 Weekly and 500 mg/m^2 Every Two Weeks Maintenance Therapy After Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Combination With Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Subjects With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyRan2009 to 2013Enrolled583ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)ArmsCetuximab plus Platinum-based Doublet Chemotherapy, Cetuximab 500 mg/m^2, Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

David F HeigenerLungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Woehrendamm 80, 22927, Grosshansdorf, Germany, d.heigener@lungenclinic.de.
José Rodrigues Pereira
Enriqueta Felip
Juraj Mazal
Lyudmila Manzyuk
Eng Huat Tan
Ofer Merimsky
Barbara Sarholz
Regina Esser
Ulrich Gatzemeier
LungenClinic Grosshansdorf · DEMerck (Germany) · DEInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGRussian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin · RUVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The First-Line Erbitux in Lung Cancer (FLEX) trial showed that the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy followed by weekly cetuximab maintenance significantly improved survival in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phase IIIb NSCLC Erbitux Trial (NEXT) trial (NCT00820755) investigated the efficacy and safety of weekly and every 2 weeks cetuximab maintenance therapy in this setting. Patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab, and those progression-free after four to six cycles were randomized to every 2 weeks (500 mg/m(2)) or weekly (250 mg/m(2)) cetuximab maintenance. Randomization was stratified for tumor histology and response status. The primary endpoint for a regimen would be reached if the lower boundary of the 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the 1-year survival rate exceeded 55 %. A planned 480 patients were to be randomized. However, enrollment was curtailed following a negative opinion from the European Medicines Agency with regard to the use of cetuximab in this setting. After combination therapy, 311/583 (53.3 %) patients without progression were randomized to maintenance therapy: 157 to every 2 weeks cetuximab and 154 to weekly cetuximab. Baseline characteristics were balanced between these groups and exposure to cetuximab was similar. The 1-year survival rate was 62.8 % (95 % CI, 54.7-70.0) for every 2 weeks cetuximab and 64.4 % (95 % CI, 56.2-71.4) for weekly cetuximab. Safety profiles were similar, manageable, and in line with expectations. Therefore, in patients with advanced NSCLC who were progression-free after four to six cycles of first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab, weekly and every 2 weeks cetuximab maintenance therapy were associated with similar survival outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrazilCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCetuximabDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleEuropeFemaleHumansIsraelKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID25195590
OpenAlexW2075971005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.